Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
D. Minn.Procedural orderFiled Sept. 13, 2018

Peet v. Sidney

Judge
Tony Leung
Docket
0:17-cv-01870
Court
U.S. District Court · District of Minnesota
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Peet v. Smith, Judge Leung granted a hearing extension and rescheduled pending dismissal and summary-judgment motions.

Who this affects

John E. Peet and the defendants whose motions were scheduled for hearing: Debbie Goettel, Michelle Luna, Sue Morfit, and “Mark Jones.”

What happened

In Peet v. Smith, John E. Peet, representing himself, asked to move a September 26, 2018, hearing date. Several defendants had filed motions to dismiss, and Peet had filed a motion for summary judgment.

The court said that hearing the motions together would be more efficient and considered Peet’s self-represented status and the court’s authority to manage its schedule. Two defendants opposed moving the hearing.

The court granted Peet’s request and rescheduled the hearing for November 1, 2018, at 1:00 p.m. The order did not decide the dismissal motions or Peet’s summary-judgment motion. Judge Tony N. Leung issued the order.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Peet v. Sidney · No. 0:17-cv-01870
Judge
Tony Leung
Date
Sept. 13, 2018

Background

Defendants Debbie Goettel, Michelle Luna, Sue Morfit, and “Mark Jones” filed motions to dismiss. Those motions were scheduled for a September 26, 2018, hearing. John E. Peet, who was representing himself, then filed a motion for summary judgment and requested an extension of the hearing date. Sue Morfitt and “Mark Jones” opposed the requested extension.

Court’s reasoning

The court relied on Peet’s self-represented status, the efficiency of hearing all three motions together, and its authority to manage its docket and courtroom proceedings.

Ruling

The court granted Peet’s request for an extension of time for the hearing. It ordered that the defendants’ motions to dismiss and Peet’s motion for summary judgment would be heard on November 1, 2018, at 1:00 p.m. in Courtroom 9W of the U.S. Courthouse in Minneapolis, Minnesota. The order addressed only the hearing date and did not rule on the merits of any of those motions.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.