Willis Electric Co., Ltd. v. Polygroup Limited
- Joan Ericksen
- 0:15-cv-03443
- U.S. District Court · District of Minnesota
- 3
In Willis Electric v. Polygroup, Judge Menendez unsealed one filing but kept two sealed because confidentiality outweighed public access.
Willis Electric Co., Ltd., Polygroup Limited, and members of the public seeking access to the court filings were affected. Polygroup’s confidential and competitively sensitive information in ECF Nos. 147 and 149 remained protected from public access.
What happened
In Willis Electric Co., Ltd. v. Polygroup Limited, the parties jointly asked the court to decide which documents filed under temporary seal should remain confidential. They agreed that filing 145 should be unsealed, but disagreed about filings 147 and 149.
The court said filings 147 and 149 had not been considered in deciding Willis’s motions. They contained confidential and competitively sensitive information, including customer information, bidding practices, and proposed allegations. Because the public’s interest in accessing documents not used by the court was weak, Polygroup’s confidentiality interest outweighed it.
The court ordered the clerk to unseal filing 145 and keep filings 147 and 149 sealed. Judge Katherine Menendez signed the order.
The detailed version
- Willis Electric Co., Ltd. v. Polygroup Limited · No. 0:15-cv-03443
- Joan Ericksen
- Oct. 16, 2018
Background
The parties filed a joint motion under Local Rule 5.6 concerning documents temporarily sealed in connection with Willis Electric Co., Ltd.’s motions to lift a stay and amend its pleadings. The parties agreed that ECF No. 145 should be unsealed. Polygroup Limited argued that ECF Nos. 147 and 149 should remain sealed, while Willis argued that they should be unsealed.
ECF No. 147 was an email between counsel discussing a proposed amendment in a related case pending in the Western District of North Carolina. ECF No. 149 was a proposed Third Amended Answer and Counterclaims that Willis, the defendant in that related case, wanted to file. The documents contained new allegations against Polygroup and information about the parties’ customers and their bidding process.
The court noted that Willis’s motion to lift the stay had been denied and its motion to amend the complaint had been deemed withdrawn without prejudice in an earlier order. The court had not reached the merits of the motion to amend, and it had not considered the contested documents.
Analysis
The court explained that judicial records generally carry a common-law presumption of public access, but that right is not absolute. Under Local Rule 5.6, the court weighed the public’s interest in access against the parties’ interests in confidentiality.
Because ECF Nos. 147 and 149 had not been considered by the court, the public interest in access to them was weak. By contrast, the documents contained confidential and competitively sensitive information, giving substantial weight to Polygroup’s interest in keeping them sealed. The court therefore concluded that Polygroup’s confidentiality interests outweighed the public’s general interest in access under the circumstances.
Disposition
The court ordered the clerk to unseal ECF No. 145 and to keep ECF Nos. 147 and 149 sealed. Judge Katherine Menendez signed the order.
Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.