Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
D. Minn.Procedural orderFiled Jan. 3, 2019

Kniebes-Larsen v. United States

Judge
Joan Ericksen
Docket
0:18-cv-01261
Court
U.S. District Court · District of Minnesota
Pages
2
HabeasCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Kniebes-Larsen v. United States, Judge Ericksen granted Brandi Kniebes-Larsen’s request to proceed without paying appellate filing fees.

Who this affects

Brandi Kniebes-Larsen, whose application to proceed without paying appellate filing fees was granted.

What happened

Kniebes-Larsen v. United States involved Brandi Kniebes-Larsen’s request to appeal without paying the filing fees. She had previously filed a petition challenging her detention under a federal law, and the court dismissed it.

The court found that she was financially eligible for fee-free appellate proceedings. Although the court remained satisfied that her claims had been properly decided, it declined to certify that her appeal was not being taken in good faith and granted her application.

Judge Joan N. Ericksen entered the order granting Kniebes-Larsen permission to proceed without paying appellate filing fees.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Kniebes-Larsen v. United States · No. 0:18-cv-01261
Judge
Joan Ericksen
Date
Jan. 3, 2019

Background

Brandi Kniebes-Larsen, who was incarcerated at the Federal Correctional Institution—Waseca, filed a notice of appeal after the court dismissed her petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 and entered judgment. The issue in this order was whether she could proceed with the appeal without paying the appellate filing fees.

Legal standard

Under 28 U.S.C. § 1915, a prisoner seeking to proceed without paying fees on appeal must show an inability to pay or provide security for the fees. The court also may not allow fee-free appellate proceedings if it certifies that the appeal is not taken in good faith. An appeal is not taken in good faith when its claims are factually or legally frivolous—that is, when they lack an arguable basis in fact or law.

Ruling

The court found that Kniebes-Larsen’s application showed she was financially eligible to proceed without paying the appellate filing fees. Although the court stated that it remained satisfied that her claims had been properly adjudicated, it declined to certify that the appeal was not taken in good faith. The court therefore granted her application to proceed without paying fees on appeal.

Disposition

The application to proceed without paying fees on appeal was GRANTED.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.