Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
D. Minn.Procedural orderFiled Mar. 18, 2019

Sunteck Transport Company, LLC v. King's Express, Inc.

Judge
Eric Tostrud
Docket
0:18-cv-03017
Court
U.S. District Court · District of Minnesota
Pages
4
Civil ProcedureContractFee Petition
In one sentence

In Sunteck Transport v. King’s Express, Judge Tostrud partly granted default judgment, awarding $32,217.70 plus interest after King’s failed to appear.

Who this affects

Sunteck Transport Company, LLC received a default judgment against King’s Express, Inc., which was held liable for damages, attorney’s fees, costs, and specified interest.

What happened

Sunteck Transport Company, LLC sued King’s Express, Inc. under the Carmack Amendment, a federal law governing carrier liability for transported goods. King’s was served, did not appear, and was found in default. The court determined that Sunteck was entitled to default judgment on the carrier-liability claim.

The court awarded Sunteck $27,936.00 in damages, $3,646.50 in attorney’s fees, and $635.20 in costs, for a total of $32,217.70 before interest. It also awarded pre-judgment interest at 4% from May 7, 2018, rather than the requested 8%, and post-judgment interest at 2.53%, rather than the requested 10%.

Judge Tostrud granted in part and denied in part Sunteck’s motion for default judgment. The motion was denied as to the requested interest rates but granted in all other respects, and Sunteck was ordered to file its pre-judgment-interest calculation within seven days after judgment was entered.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Sunteck Transport Company, LLC v. King's Express, Inc. · No. 0:18-cv-03017
Judge
Eric Tostrud
Date
Mar. 18, 2019

Background

Sunteck moved for default judgment against King’s Express, Inc. The summons and complaint were served on King’s through the Secretary of State on November 2, 2018. King’s did not appear, and the clerk entered King’s default. Sunteck served King’s with the entry of default, the motion, and the supporting papers.

The court found that Sunteck had shown it was entitled to judgment on Count 1, which alleged carrier liability under the Carmack Amendment, 49 U.S.C. § 14706. For purposes of the motion, Sunteck assumed that its breach-of-contract claim was preempted by the Carmack Amendment.

Damages, Fees, Costs, and Interest

The court stated that establishing liability through default did not eliminate Sunteck’s obligation to prove its actual damages with reasonable certainty. Based on the evidence, the court awarded $27,936.00 in damages, $3,646.50 in attorney’s fees, and $635.20 in costs. These amounts totaled $32,217.70.

Sunteck requested pre-judgment interest at 8% per year from May 7, 2018, and post-judgment interest at 10% per year. The court denied those requested rates. It instead granted pre-judgment interest at 4% per year from May 7, 2018, and post-judgment interest at 2.53% per year beginning when judgment was entered, calculated as described in 28 U.S.C. § 1961(b).

Disposition

Judge Eric C. Tostrud ordered that Sunteck’s motion for default judgment was GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. The motion was denied insofar as it sought pre-judgment interest at 8% and post-judgment interest at 10%. It was granted in all other respects. King’s was ordered liable to Sunteck for $32,217.70, plus the pre-judgment interest amount to be calculated after Sunteck’s submission and the specified post-judgment interest. Sunteck was ordered to file its pre-judgment-interest calculation within seven days after judgment was entered.

The authoritative version

Read the full 4-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.