Stone v. Jesson
- Elizabeth Cowan Wright
- 0:11-cv-00951
- U.S. District Court · District of Minnesota
- 1
In Stone v. Jesson, Judge Wright adopted the recommendation and denied Stone’s motion to certify a class.
Charles Richard Stone, whose motion to certify a class was denied. The opinion does not describe the proposed class or identify any additional affected people.
What happened
In Stone v. Jesson, Charles Richard Stone asked the court to certify a class in his case. The opinion does not describe the claims or the proposed class.
A magistrate judge recommended denying the motion. Because no one objected, the court reviewed the recommendation for clear error and found none.
Judge Wilhelmina M. Wright adopted the recommendation and denied Stone’s motion to certify a class.
The detailed version
- Stone v. Jesson · No. 0:11-cv-00951
- Elizabeth Cowan Wright
- Aug. 9, 2019
Background
Charles Richard Stone filed a motion to certify a class. The opinion does not provide details about the underlying claims, the proposed class, or the arguments on class certification.
Recommendation and Review
United States Magistrate Judge Hildy Bowbeer issued a May 30, 2019 Report and Recommendation recommending disposition of the class-certification motion. No objections were filed. Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b), the district court therefore reviewed the recommendation for clear error. The court stated that it found no clear error.
Ruling
Judge Wilhelmina M. Wright adopted the May 30, 2019 Report and Recommendation and denied Charles Richard Stone’s Motion to Certify Class. The opinion does not state any other disposition.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.