Stone v. Jesson
- Elizabeth Cowan Wright
- 0:11-cv-00951
- U.S. District Court · District of Minnesota
- 1
In Stone v. Jesson, Judge Wright adopted the recommendation and granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment.
Charles Richard Stone and the defendants named in the case were affected. The opinion does not identify the claims or explain the underlying dispute.
What happened
In Stone v. Jesson, the court reviewed a magistrate judge’s recommendation after no party filed objections. The opinion does not describe the underlying claims or the recommendation’s analysis.
The court reviewed the recommendation for clear error and found none. It adopted the recommendation.
Judge Wilhelmina M. Wright granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment and ordered that judgment be entered.
The detailed version
- Stone v. Jesson · No. 0:11-cv-00951
- Elizabeth Cowan Wright
- Jan. 9, 2020
Background
The opinion concerns a December 3, 2019 report and recommendation by United States Magistrate Judge Hildy Bowbeer. The provided opinion does not state the factual allegations, claims, or legal analysis addressed in that recommendation.
Court’s review
No objections were filed within the permitted time. Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b), the court therefore reviewed the recommendation for clear error, meaning an obvious mistake. The court found no clear error.
Ruling
Judge Wilhelmina M. Wright adopted the report and recommendation. The court granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment and ordered that judgment be entered accordingly.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.