Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
D. Minn.Substantive rulingFiled Feb. 12, 2020

In Re: RFC and RESCAP Liquidating Trust Litigation

Judge
Susan Nelson
Docket
0:13-cv-03451
Court
U.S. District Court · District of Minnesota
Pages
3
Summary JudgmentContractCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In ResCap Liquidating Trust v. Primary Residential Mortgage, Inc., Judge Nelson granted consented summary judgment and dismissed ResCap’s breach-of-contract claim with prejudice.

Who this affects

ResCap Liquidating Trust’s breach-of-contract claim against Primary Residential Mortgage, Inc. was dismissed with prejudice after ResCap consented to summary judgment.

What happened

In ResCap Liquidating Trust v. Primary Residential Mortgage, Inc., ResCap previously sued Primary Residential Mortgage, Inc. over a breach-of-contract claim identified as Count One.

ResCap initially argued that dismissing the claim would be premature. After further proceedings, it sent the court a letter consenting to summary judgment on Count One. Primary Residential Mortgage had requested summary judgment on that claim.

Judge Susan Richard Nelson granted Primary Residential Mortgage’s motion for summary judgment on Count One and dismissed the breach-of-contract claim with prejudice.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
In Re: RFC and RESCAP Liquidating Trust Litigation · No. 0:13-cv-03451
Judge
Susan Nelson
Date
Feb. 12, 2020

Background

ResCap Liquidating Trust sued Primary Residential Mortgage, Inc. The opinion concerns Count One of ResCap’s complaint, a breach-of-contract claim. Primary Residential Mortgage previously moved for summary judgment, which is a decision without a trial when the court determines that the applicable legal standard is met based on the record. The court had deferred ruling while ResCap considered whether it would consent to dismissal of the claim.

At a January 23, 2020 final pretrial conference, ResCap indicated that it was willing to withdraw the claim under terms similar to an earlier stipulation involving a different defendant. Primary Residential Mortgage did not agree to that proposed course and argued that ResCap’s failure to respond to the summary-judgment motion warranted dismissal with prejudice. The court then directed ResCap to respond in writing.

Ruling

On February 5, 2020, ResCap filed a letter consenting to entry of summary judgment on Count One. In light of that consent, Judge Susan Richard Nelson ordered that Primary Residential Mortgage’s motion for summary judgment as to Count One was granted, and that Count One was dismissed with prejudice. The order resolved ResCap’s breach-of-contract claim against Primary Residential Mortgage.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.