Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
D. Minn.Procedural orderFiled Mar. 9, 2020

DeLeon v. Rios

Judge
Eric Tostrud
Docket
0:19-cv-01834
Court
U.S. District Court · District of Minnesota
Pages
1
HabeasCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In DeLeon v. Rios, Judge Tostrud accepted the recommendation and dismissed Alfredo DeLeon's habeas petition with prejudice.

Who this affects

Alfredo DeLeon, whose petition for a writ of habeas corpus was dismissed with prejudice; Warden M. Rios was the respondent.

What happened

In DeLeon v. Rios, Alfredo DeLeon asked the federal court to review his detention through a habeas petition. The opinion does not explain the petition's underlying claims or the magistrate judge's reasons for recommending dismissal.

Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz issued a report and recommendation on February 14, 2020. No party objected, so the court reviewed it for clear error and found none.

Judge Eric C. Tostrud accepted the report and recommendation and dismissed the habeas petition with prejudice. The court ordered that judgment be entered accordingly.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
DeLeon v. Rios · No. 0:19-cv-01834
Judge
Eric Tostrud
Date
Mar. 9, 2020

Background

Alfredo DeLeon filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus against Warden M. Rios. The opinion does not describe the petition's underlying allegations or legal grounds. United States Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz issued a Report and Recommendation on February 14, 2020, recommending a disposition that the district court then reviewed.

Review of the Recommendation

No party objected to the Report and Recommendation. Under the applicable procedure, the district court therefore reviewed it for clear error. The court found no clear error.

Ruling

Judge Eric C. Tostrud accepted the Report and Recommendation and ordered that DeLeon's petition for a writ of habeas corpus be dismissed with prejudice. The court also ordered entry of judgment. The opinion does not provide a merits analysis or state why the petition was dismissed.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.