Leekley-Winslow v. Fairview Health Services
- Susan Nelson
- 0:19-cv-00587
- U.S. District Court · District of Minnesota
- 2
In Leekley-Winslow v. Fairview Health Services, Judge Menendez granted more time for service forms but denied without prejudice early discovery and a discovery demand.
The order directly affected Colton Leekley-Winslow, Fairview Health Services, and the three unidentified defendants. It gave Leekley-Winslow 60 additional days to file service forms and denied without prejudice his request for early and compelled discovery.
What happened
In Leekley-Winslow v. Fairview Health Services, Colton Leekley-Winslow asked for more time to file service forms and sought early discovery to identify three unknown defendants.
The court found good cause for more time because Leekley-Winslow was diligently pursuing his claims, had requested the extension on time, and Fairview Health Services was working to identify the unknown defendants. Fairview had not yet been served or waived service.
The court, Judge Katherine M. Menendez, granted the motion for an extension and extended the deadline by 60 days. It denied without prejudice the motion for early discovery and to compel discovery because Fairview was already voluntarily working to provide the information and the court had no jurisdiction over Fairview before service or waiver.
The detailed version
- Leekley-Winslow v. Fairview Health Services · No. 0:19-cv-00587
- Susan Nelson
- Mar. 25, 2020
Background
Colton Leekley-Winslow filed two motions. First, he asked for additional time to file United States Marshals Service forms needed to serve three unidentified defendants: “Nurse 1,” “Detention Team Member 1,” and “Psych Associate 1.” Second, he asked to conduct discovery earlier than usual and to compel Fairview Health Services to disclose the identities of those defendants.
The court had previously granted Leekley-Winslow permission to proceed without paying filing fees and had ordered him to complete and return the service forms within 30 days. Fairview had not waived service or otherwise been served. Fairview told the court that it was working to identify the unknown defendants, and Leekley-Winslow acknowledged that effort in his motion for an extension.
Court’s analysis
The court found good cause to extend the service deadline. It relied on Leekley-Winslow’s diligent pursuit of his claims, his timely request for an extension, and Fairview’s stated efforts to identify the unknown defendants. The court concluded that a moderate extension was reasonable.
The court determined that early discovery and compelled discovery were unnecessary at that time because Fairview was voluntarily working with Leekley-Winslow to provide the requested information. The court also stated that, because Fairview had not been served or waived service, the court had no jurisdiction over Fairview.
Order
Judge Katherine M. Menendez’s order granted Leekley-Winslow’s motion for an extension of time to file the service forms. The deadline was extended by 60 days from the date of the order. The order denied without prejudice Leekley-Winslow’s motion to allow earlier discovery and to compel discovery. The parties were encouraged to work together to identify the unknown defendants.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.