Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
D. Minn.Procedural orderFiled May 22, 2020

Larson v. Allina Health System

Judge
Susan Nelson
Docket
0:17-cv-03835
Court
U.S. District Court · District of Minnesota
Pages
6
ErisaFee PetitionClass Action
In one sentence

In Larson v. Allina Health System, Judge Nelson granted plaintiffs’ motion for attorneys’ fees, expenses, and class-representative contribution awards.

Who this affects

The order directly affected the class counsel, the three class representatives, the settlement class, and the settlement fund. It also resolved objections filed by four objectors.

What happened

Larson v. Allina Health System was a class action in which the court considered class counsel’s request for attorneys’ fees, expense reimbursement, and payments to the class representatives after a settlement. The court had previously approved sending notice to the settlement class.

Four people objected to the fee request, but none challenged the settlement’s fairness or reasonableness. The court found the requested fees and expenses reasonable, considering the benefits to the class, the risks and work involved, and counsel’s experience. It overruled the objections and found that the requested expenses were necessary.

Judge Nelson granted the motion. The order awarded class counsel $808,252.50 in attorneys’ fees and $12,413.78 in expenses, payable from the settlement fund, and awarded each class representative $5,000.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Larson v. Allina Health System · No. 0:17-cv-03835
Judge
Susan Nelson
Date
May 22, 2020

Background

This order addressed plaintiffs’ motion for attorneys’ fees, reimbursement of litigation expenses, and case contribution awards for the class representatives. The court stated that it had found the settlement fair, reasonable, and adequate. A previous order had authorized notice to the settlement class, and 69,558 notices were mailed, with a reported 95.87% mailing rate. Four objections were filed, representing less than 0.01% of the people who received mailed notice. The objections challenged the requested attorneys’ fees and expenses, but did not challenge the settlement’s fairness or reasonableness.

Court’s analysis

The court found the requested fees and expenses reasonable. It considered the benefit provided to the settlement class, the limited number of objections, the risks class counsel accepted without a promise of recovery or payment, counsel’s experience, the substantial work performed, and counsel’s continuing commitment to oversee the claims process and future work. The court also noted that an independent fiduciary hired by the defendants had found the settlement and fee request reasonable.

The court rejected the objections to the fee allocation and overruled them. It found the objections concerning a possible maximum of $50,000 in expenses moot because plaintiffs requested only $12,413.78. The court also found those expenses necessary for prosecuting the case.

Disposition

Judge Susan Richard Nelson granted the motion for attorneys’ fees, expenses, and case contribution awards. The court awarded class counsel $808,252.50 in attorneys’ fees and $12,413.78 in expenses, to be paid from the settlement fund. It also awarded each class representative $5,000 as a case contribution award.

The authoritative version

Read the full 6-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.