Saidi O. v. DHS/ICE
- Wilhelmina Wright
- 0:20-cv-00790
- U.S. District Court · District of Minnesota
- 1
In Saidi O. v. DHS/ICE, Judge Wright adopted the recommendation, dismissed the habeas petition without prejudice, and denied the removal request without prejudice.
Saidi O.’s habeas petition was dismissed without prejudice, and Saidi O.’s request to restrain removal was denied without prejudice. DHS/ICE was the respondent.
What happened
Saidi O. filed a petition asking the court for a legal remedy concerning detention or custody and separately asked the court to restrain removal. The opinion does not explain the underlying facts or arguments.
A magistrate judge recommended a result, and neither side filed objections. The court reviewed the recommendation for clear error and found none.
In Saidi O. v. DHS/ICE, Judge Wilhelmina M. Wright adopted the recommendation, dismissed Saidi O.’s petition without prejudice, and denied the request to restrain removal without prejudice.
The detailed version
- Saidi O. v. DHS/ICE · No. 0:20-cv-00790
- Wilhelmina Wright
- Aug. 10, 2020
Background
Saidi O. filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus, a court filing seeking relief from allegedly unlawful custody or restraint. Saidi O. also filed a request to restrain removal. The opinion does not describe the factual basis for either filing or the parties’ arguments.
Recommendation and review
United States Magistrate Judge Becky R. Thorson issued a June 30, 2020 Report and Recommendation. No objections were filed. Because there were no timely objections, the court reviewed the recommendation for clear error and found none.
Ruling
The court adopted the June 30, 2020 Report and Recommendation. It dismissed Saidi O.’s habeas petition without prejudice and denied Saidi O.’s request to restrain removal without prejudice. The opinion does not state the reason for either disposition.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.