Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
D. Minn.Procedural orderFiled Jan. 5, 2021

Irwin v. M.S.O.P.

Judge
Paul Magnuson
Docket
0:20-cv-01662
Court
U.S. District Court · District of Minnesota
Pages
2
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Jerry T. Irwin v. M.S.O.P., Judge Magnuson dismissed the complaint without prejudice and denied fee-waiver and counsel requests as moot after adopting a recommendation.

Who this affects

Jerry T. Irwin’s complaint was dismissed without prejudice. His application to proceed without prepaying fees or costs and his request for appointed counsel were denied as moot. M.S.O.P. was the named defendant.

What happened

In Jerry T. Irwin v. M.S.O.P., a magistrate judge recommended dismissing Irwin’s complaint without prejudice and denying his requests to proceed without prepaying fees and to have a lawyer appointed. The opinion does not state the underlying reason for recommending dismissal.

Irwin did not object to the recommendation before the deadline. Because there were no objections, the court reviewed the recommendation for clear error and found none.

Judge Paul A. Magnuson adopted the recommendation, dismissed the complaint without prejudice, and denied both the fee-waiver application and the request for appointed counsel as moot. The court directed that judgment be entered.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Irwin v. M.S.O.P. · No. 0:20-cv-01662
Judge
Paul Magnuson
Date
Jan. 5, 2021

Background

The matter concerned Jerry T. Irwin’s complaint against M.S.O.P. The opinion does not describe the complaint’s underlying claims or the reason the magistrate judge recommended dismissal.

Recommendation and Review

United States Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois issued a Report and Recommendation dated December 1, 2020. It recommended dismissing the complaint without prejudice, meaning the dismissal did not itself bar refiling, and denying as moot Irwin’s application to proceed without prepaying fees or costs and his request for appointment of counsel.

Irwin filed no objections, and the deadline for doing so had passed. Under the governing procedure, the district court reviews an unobjected-to recommendation for clear error, meaning an obvious mistake. The court reviewed the recommendation and found no error, clear or otherwise.

Ruling

Judge Paul A. Magnuson adopted the Report and Recommendation. The court dismissed the complaint without prejudice, denied as moot Irwin’s application to proceed without prepaying fees or costs, and denied as moot his motion to appoint counsel. The court directed that judgment be entered accordingly.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.