Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
D. Minn.Procedural orderFiled Jan. 19, 2021

Williams v. Howard

Judge
Katherine Menendez
Docket
0:20-cv-00439
Court
U.S. District Court · District of Minnesota
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Williams v. Howard, Judge Thorson denied Terrence T. Williams’s requests to waive court fees and appoint counsel.

Who this affects

Terrence T. Williams was required to continue paying the $350 filing fee through the statutory monthly-payment process, and he did not receive appointed counsel. The defendants were not granted or denied relief by these rulings.

What happened

In Williams v. Howard, Terrence T. Williams asked the court to waive his filing fees and appoint a lawyer for him.

The court said Williams still had to pay the unpaid $350 filing fee through monthly payments required by federal law, even though he was allowed to proceed without paying the full fee upfront. The court also found that his case was not unusually complicated compared with other cases filed by prisoners without lawyers.

Judge Thorson denied both requests: the request to waive court fees and the request for attorney representation.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Williams v. Howard · No. 0:20-cv-00439
Judge
Katherine Menendez
Date
Jan. 19, 2021

Background

The court considered Terrence T. Williams’s requests to waive court fees and to appoint counsel. The opinion describes the case as pro se prisoner litigation, meaning Williams was litigating without a lawyer.

Court-fee request

The court denied Williams’s request to waive the remaining filing fee. In an earlier order, the court had told Williams that he owed the unpaid balance of the statutory filing fee, $350. The court explained that under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2), a prisoner allowed to proceed without paying the full fee upfront must still make monthly payments equal to 20 percent of the preceding month’s income credited to the prisoner’s account until the full filing fee is paid. The court stated that Williams had to pay the fee regardless of the case’s outcome and according to the procedure in that statute.

Request for appointed counsel

The court explained that a person representing himself in a civil case does not have an automatic statutory or constitutional right to appointed counsel. Appointment of counsel in a civil case is within the district court’s discretion. After reviewing Williams’s amended complaint and other filings, the court concluded that the case was not significantly more complicated than other prisoner cases filed without lawyers in that court. It therefore found that appointment of counsel did not appear warranted at that time.

Order

The court ordered that Williams’s motion seeking a waiver of court fees and attorney representation was DENIED. It separately ordered that his motion for attorney representation was DENIED. Judge Becky R. Thorson, a United States Magistrate Judge, signed the order.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.