Nur v. Olmsted County
- Wilhelmina Wright
- 0:19-cv-02384
- U.S. District Court · District of Minnesota
- 2
In Nur v. Olmsted County, Judge Wright granted summary judgment on excessive force, dismissed Sanders, and denied it without prejudice on deliberate indifference.
Kaiser Faisal Nur’s excessive-force claim was dismissed with prejudice, and Deputy Elizabeth Sanders was dismissed from the lawsuit. Nur’s deliberate-indifference claim against Olmsted County and any appropriate additional defendants remained subject to discovery and possible further summary-judgment proceedings.
What happened
In Nur v. Olmsted County, the court reviewed a magistrate judge’s recommendation on the defendants’ motion for summary judgment. No party objected, so the court reviewed the recommendation for clear error and found none.
The court granted the motion as to Kaiser Faisal Nur’s excessive-force claim and dismissed that claim with prejudice. Deputy Elizabeth Sanders was dismissed from the lawsuit. The court denied the motion without prejudice as to Nur’s deliberate-indifference claim and ordered additional, limited discovery.
Judge Wilhelmina M. Wright adopted the recommendation on January 19, 2021. The order allowed Nur to amend his complaint to add appropriate defendants, permitted a later summary-judgment motion, and set deadlines leading toward trial.
The detailed version
- Nur v. Olmsted County · No. 0:19-cv-02384
- Wilhelmina Wright
- Jan. 19, 2021
Background
The court considered an October 9, 2020 report and recommendation by United States Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz. The recommendation addressed Defendants’ motion for summary judgment, which asks the court to enter judgment without a trial when the record shows no genuine dispute requiring one. No objections were filed. Under the applicable rule, the court therefore reviewed the recommendation for clear error and found none.
Rulings
The court adopted the report and recommendation and ruled on the defendants’ motion as follows:
- The motion was granted as to Kaiser Faisal Nur’s first cause of action, which concerned excessive force. That claim was dismissed with prejudice. - Deputy Elizabeth Sanders was dismissed from the lawsuit. - The motion was denied without prejudice as to Nur’s second cause of action, which concerned deliberate indifference. The claim therefore remained pending while the parties developed the record.
Further proceedings
The parties were allowed 90 days from the order’s date to complete written discovery and depositions limited to the deliberate-indifference claim. Nur could amend his complaint to add appropriate defendants to that claim no later than 10 days after the additional discovery period ended. Olmsted County and any new defendant could then file a summary-judgment motion on the deliberate-indifference claim. The order also set deadlines for that motion and required the parties to be ready for trial within the specified period after a ruling on the motion, or after the filing deadline if no motion was filed.
Judge Wilhelmina M. Wright’s order adopted the recommendation and left the deliberate-indifference claim for further proceedings while ending the excessive-force claim and dismissing Deputy Sanders from the lawsuit.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.