Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
D. Minn.Procedural orderFiled Apr. 12, 2021

Kirchner v. F.B.I., The

Judge
Wilhelmina Wright
Docket
0:21-cv-00247
Court
U.S. District Court · District of Minnesota
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Kirchner v. F.B.I., Judge Wright overruled objections, adopted the recommendation, dismissed the matter without prejudice for lack of jurisdiction, and denied the fee application as moot.

Who this affects

Steven M. Kirchner’s case was dismissed without prejudice for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction, and his application to proceed without prepaying fees or costs was denied as moot. The F.B.I. and the other defendants were affected by the dismissal.

What happened

Steven M. Kirchner sued The F.B.I. and other defendants. He represented himself and sent letters objecting to a magistrate judge’s recommendation.

The court found that the letters did not show a legal or factual error. It overruled Kirchner’s objections, adopted the recommendation, and dismissed the matter without prejudice because the court lacked authority to hear it. The court also denied Kirchner’s application to proceed without prepaying fees or costs as moot.

Judge Wilhelmina M. Wright issued the order on April 12, 2021.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Kirchner v. F.B.I., The · No. 0:21-cv-00247
Judge
Wilhelmina Wright
Date
Apr. 12, 2021

Background

The court considered a February 26, 2021 report and recommendation from United States Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois. Steven M. Kirchner submitted letters during the objection period. Because Kirchner was representing himself, the court interpreted the letters broadly as objections to the recommendation.

Court’s analysis

The court reviewed the objections and concluded that they did not identify a legal or factual error warranting rejection of the recommendation. The court also reviewed the recommendation itself and found that it was neither clearly erroneous nor contrary to law. The opinion does not explain the underlying claims or provide further details about why subject-matter jurisdiction was lacking.

Ruling

The court overruled Kirchner’s objections and adopted the February 26, 2021 report and recommendation. It dismissed the matter without prejudice for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. It also denied Kirchner’s application to proceed in district court without prepaying fees or costs as moot. Judge Wilhelmina M. Wright directed that judgment be entered.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.