Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
D. Minn.Procedural orderFiled May 10, 2021

Simmons v. Clerk of Appellate Courts

Judge
Eric Tostrud
Docket
0:21-cv-00695
Court
U.S. District Court · District of Minnesota
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Simmons v. Clerk of Appellate Courts, Judge Tostrud dismissed the action without prejudice and denied Simmons’s request to proceed without paying filing fees as moot.

Who this affects

Scott Lawrence Simmons’s action was dismissed without prejudice, and his application to proceed without paying filing fees was denied as moot. The order does not describe any merits ruling on his claims.

What happened

In Simmons v. Clerk of Appellate Courts and Dakota County District Court, Scott Lawrence Simmons brought this action against the listed defendants. The opinion does not describe the claims.

Magistrate Judge Katherine M. Menendez issued a recommended decision on March 22, 2021. No party objected, so the court reviewed it for an obvious mistake and found none.

Judge Eric C. Tostrud accepted the recommendation, dismissed the action without prejudice under federal law, and denied Simmons’s request to proceed without paying filing fees as moot.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Simmons v. Clerk of Appellate Courts · No. 0:21-cv-00695
Judge
Eric Tostrud
Date
May 10, 2021

Background

Scott Lawrence Simmons was the plaintiff, and the Clerk of Appellate Courts and Dakota County District Court were the defendants. The opinion does not describe the claims or the underlying events.

Recommendation and Review

Magistrate Judge Katherine M. Menendez issued a Report and Recommendation on March 22, 2021. No party objected. Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b), Judge Eric C. Tostrud therefore reviewed the recommendation for clear error, meaning an obvious mistake. He found no clear error.

Ruling

The court accepted the Report and Recommendation and dismissed the action without prejudice under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). The order does not state the specific reason for the statutory dismissal. The court also denied Simmons’s application to proceed without paying filing fees as moot. Judgment was ordered to be entered.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.