Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
D. Minn.Procedural orderFiled Sept. 14, 2021

Haggins v. Renville Co. Jail Administrator

Judge
Wilhelmina Wright
Docket
0:21-cv-01315
Court
U.S. District Court · District of Minnesota
Pages
1
HabeasCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Haggins v. Renville Co. Jail Administrator, Judge Wright dismissed DeJuan Haggins’s petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 without prejudice for failure to prosecute.

Who this affects

DeJuan Haggins’s § 2241 petition was dismissed without prejudice; the opinion identifies Renville Co. Jail Administrator as the respondent.

What happened

In Haggins v. Renville Co. Jail Administrator, DeJuan Haggins filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The opinion does not describe the petition’s underlying claims.

The court considered a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation. No objections were filed, so the court reviewed the recommendation for clear error and found none.

Judge Wilhelmina M. Wright adopted the report and recommendation and dismissed Haggins’s petition without prejudice for failure to prosecute. The court ordered that judgment be entered.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Haggins v. Renville Co. Jail Administrator · No. 0:21-cv-01315
Judge
Wilhelmina Wright
Date
Sept. 14, 2021

Background

DeJuan Haggins filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The opinion does not provide details about the claims or the relief Haggins sought.

Report and Recommendation

United States Magistrate Judge Hildy Bowbeer issued a June 22, 2021 report and recommendation. No party filed objections. Because there were no timely objections, the district court reviewed the report and recommendation for clear error under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). The court found no clear error.

Ruling

The court adopted the June 22, 2021 report and recommendation. It dismissed Haggins’s § 2241 petition without prejudice for failure to prosecute and ordered that judgment be entered.

Result

The opinion resolves the petition on a procedural ground and does not decide the underlying habeas issue.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.