Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
D. Minn.Procedural orderFiled Oct. 27, 2021

Ybarra v. Kallis

Judge
Wilhelmina Wright
Docket
0:21-cv-01846
Court
U.S. District Court · District of Minnesota
Pages
1
HabeasCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Ybarra v. Kallis, Judge Wright adopted the recommendation, denied Ybarra’s fee-waiver application as moot, and dismissed his petition without prejudice.

Who this affects

Jeremiah Ybarra’s petition and fee-waiver application were affected. Warden Kallis was the respondent.

What happened

In Ybarra v. Kallis, Magistrate Judge Hildy Bowbeer issued a report and recommendation on the petition. No objections were filed.

Because there were no timely objections, the court reviewed the recommendation for clear error. The order does not describe the recommendation’s reasoning.

The court found no clear error, adopted the recommendation, denied Jeremiah Ybarra’s application to proceed without paying the filing fee as moot, and dismissed his petition without prejudice. Judge Wilhelmina M. Wright signed the order.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Ybarra v. Kallis · No. 0:21-cv-01846
Judge
Wilhelmina Wright
Date
Oct. 27, 2021

Background

Jeremiah Ybarra filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus and an application to proceed without paying the filing fee. United States Magistrate Judge Hildy Bowbeer issued a report and recommendation on August 30, 2021. No objections were filed.

Court’s review

When no timely objections are filed, the district court reviews a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation for clear error. After reviewing the recommendation, the court found no clear error. The opinion does not provide the recommendation’s underlying analysis or explain why the petition was dismissed.

Ruling

The court adopted the August 30, 2021 report and recommendation. It denied Ybarra’s application to proceed without paying the filing fee as moot. It dismissed Ybarra’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus without prejudice, meaning the order did not bar refiling. Judge Wilhelmina M. Wright directed that judgment be entered accordingly.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.