Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
D. Minn.Procedural orderFiled Nov. 1, 2021

Zongo v. Brott

Judge
Nancy Brasel
Docket
0:21-cv-00407
Court
U.S. District Court · District of Minnesota
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Zongo v. Brott, Judge Thorson granted in part and denied in part Zongo’s request for computer access or more time to respond.

Who this affects

Wendkouni Wilfried Arnold Zongo, who was representing himself, received more time to respond but did not obtain a court order requiring the Sherburne County Jail to provide computer access. Joel Brott received a deadline to file a reply.

What happened

In Zongo v. Brott, Wendkouni Wilfried Arnold Zongo asked the court to order the Sherburne County Jail to give him computer access or to extend his deadline for responding to the defendant’s motion to dismiss. The court declined to manage the jail’s day-to-day operations.

The court granted in part and denied in part Zongo’s motion. It denied his request for a court order requiring computer access but gave him until November 15, 2021, to file his response. The defendant could file a reply by December 6, 2021, and the court stated that no further extensions would be granted.

Judge Thorson noted that Zongo was representing himself and lacked detailed legal experience and unlimited legal materials. The court said it would read his filing broadly.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Zongo v. Brott · No. 0:21-cv-00407
Judge
Nancy Brasel
Date
Nov. 1, 2021

Background

The court considered Plaintiff Wendkouni Wilfried Arnold Zongo’s motion for access to a computer or for an extension of time. The court had previously set October 27, 2021, as the deadline for Zongo to respond to Defendant Joel Brott’s pending motion to dismiss. Zongo asked the court either to order the Sherburne County Jail to provide him computer access or to extend the briefing deadline.

Ruling

The court declined to order the detention facility to take a particular action concerning Zongo’s access to materials, explaining that courts generally refrain from managing detention facilities’ day-to-day operations. The court nevertheless allowed additional time for Zongo to respond.

The order granted in part and denied in part Zongo’s motion. It denied the motion insofar as Zongo requested a court order requiring the Sherburne County Jail to provide computer access. It allowed Zongo to file his response by November 15, 2021. The defendant’s reply was due December 6, 2021, and the court stated that no further extensions would be granted.

Effect on the case

This order addressed access to materials and briefing deadlines; it did not decide the pending motion to dismiss or the underlying claims. The court also stated that Zongo’s submission would be construed broadly because he was representing himself and lacked detailed legal experience and unlimited legal materials. Judge Becky R. Thorson signed the order as a United States Magistrate Judge.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.