Kalichenko v. Barnes
- Wilhelmina Wright
- 0:20-cv-01646
- U.S. District Court · District of Minnesota
- 2
In Kalichenko v. Barnes, Judge Wright granted defendants’ motion, denied a temporary restraining order as moot, and dismissed the amended complaint without prejudice.
Olena Kalichenko’s amended complaint was dismissed without prejudice. The defendants’ motion to dismiss or, alternatively, for summary judgment was granted, and Kalichenko’s request for a temporary restraining order was denied as moot.
What happened
In Kalichenko v. Barnes, the court reviewed a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation because no party filed objections. The court reviewed it for clear error and found none.
The court adopted the report and recommendation and granted the defendants’ motion to dismiss or, alternatively, for summary judgment. It denied Kalichenko’s request for a temporary restraining order as moot.
The court dismissed Kalichenko’s amended complaint without prejudice and directed that judgment be entered. The order was issued by Judge Wilhelmina M. Wright.
The detailed version
- Kalichenko v. Barnes · No. 0:20-cv-01646
- Wilhelmina Wright
- Mar. 2, 2022
Background
The court considered a December 7, 2021 report and recommendation issued by United States Magistrate Judge Becky R. Thorson. No objections were filed.
Court’s Review
Because no timely objections were filed, the court reviewed the report and recommendation for clear error under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). After reviewing it, the court found no clear error.
Rulings
The court adopted the report and recommendation. It granted the defendants’ motion to dismiss or, alternatively, for summary judgment. The court also denied Kalichenko’s request for a temporary restraining order as moot.
The court dismissed Kalichenko’s amended complaint without prejudice and directed that judgment be entered. The order does not explain whether the dismissal was based on the motion to dismiss or the alternative request for summary judgment.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.