Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
D. Minn.Procedural orderFiled June 7, 2022

Tristan M. v. Kijakazi

Judge
Tony Leung
Docket
0:20-cv-02247
Court
U.S. District Court · District of Minnesota
Pages
6
Social SecurityFee Petition
In one sentence

In Tristan M. v. Kijakazi, Judge Leung granted an Equal Access to Justice Act fee motion, awarding $7,995 in fees and $100 in costs.

Who this affects

Tristan M. received an award of $7,995 in attorney fees and $100 in costs, payable to him as the litigant and subject to offset for any preexisting debt owed to the United States.

What happened

Tristan M. v. Kijakazi followed an earlier order that partly granted Tristan M.’s request for summary judgment and sent the matter back to the Social Security Administration for further proceedings. Tristan M. then sought attorney fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act.

The Commissioner of Social Security challenged the number of hours requested, arguing that 24.39 hours—not 39 hours—was reasonable. Tristan M. argued that the case involved a nearly 1,200-page record and complex issues, and that the requested hours were reasonable.

Judge Tony N. Leung granted the fee motion. The court awarded $7,995 for 39 hours at $205 per hour and $100 in costs, payable to Tristan M. as the litigant and subject to offset for any preexisting debt owed to the United States.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Tristan M. v. Kijakazi · No. 0:20-cv-02247
Judge
Tony Leung
Date
June 7, 2022

Background

The court had previously partly granted Tristan M.’s summary-judgment motion and remanded the matter to the Social Security Administration for further proceedings. Tristan M. then moved for attorney fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act, a federal law that generally allows a prevailing party in a case against the United States to recover reasonable fees unless the government’s position was substantially justified or special circumstances would make an award unjust.

The Commissioner did not argue that either exception applied. Instead, the Commissioner challenged the amount requested. Tristan M.’s counsel reported 43.2 hours of work but requested compensation for 39 hours at $205 per hour, totaling $7,995, plus $100 in costs.

Parties’ Arguments

The Commissioner argued that only 24.39 hours were reasonable and that the award should be no more than $5,000. The Commissioner challenged some time entries as too vague, argued that counsel should have reduced the time spent on a legal issue referred to as the “Selia” issue, and argued that counsel did not need to file a reply because the parties had agreed to a remand.

Tristan M. argued that the requested time was reasonable because the administrative record was almost 1,200 pages, some issues were factually intensive and complex, and counsel had not represented him in the administrative proceedings and therefore needed time to become familiar with the record. Tristan M. also argued that counsel had already voluntarily reduced the compensable hours from 43.2 to 39.

Court’s Analysis

The court found that the requested 39 hours were reasonable. It rejected the Commissioner’s objections that particular entries were too vague and that the time spent on the “Selia” argument was excessive. The court also declined to reduce the award because the Commissioner agreed to remand and no reply brief was necessary.

The court applied a rate of $205 per hour because the requested rate was supported by cost-of-living data and the Commissioner did not challenge that method. The court concluded that 39 hours at that rate, for a total of $7,995, was consistent with other Equal Access to Justice Act awards in Social Security cases in the district. It also found the requested $100 in costs reasonable.

Ruling

Judge Tony N. Leung granted Tristan M.’s motion for attorney fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act. The order awarded $7,995 in attorney fees and $100 in costs. The fees and costs are payable to Tristan M. as the litigant and may be offset to satisfy any preexisting debt Tristan M. owes to the United States.

The authoritative version

Read the full 6-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.