Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
D. Minn.Procedural orderFiled June 21, 2022

Polly O. v. Kijakazi

Judge
Eric Tostrud
Docket
0:20-cv-01820
Court
U.S. District Court · District of Minnesota
Pages
2
Fee PetitionSocial Security
In one sentence

In Polly O. v. Kijakazi, Judge Tostrud granted Polly O.’s fee motion and awarded $9,655.50 plus $500 in costs.

Who this affects

Polly O. receives the awarded fees and costs, subject to any offset for qualifying preexisting debts owed to the United States.

What happened

In Polly O. v. Kijakazi, the court reviewed a magistrate judge’s recommendation about Polly O.’s request for attorney fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act. Neither party objected to the recommendation.

Because there were no objections, the court reviewed the recommendation for clear error, meaning an obvious mistake. The court found no clear error and accepted the recommendation.

Judge Tostrud granted the fee motion and awarded Polly O. $9,655.50 in attorney fees and $500 in costs. The award is payable to Polly O. as the litigant and may be reduced to cover qualifying debts owed to the United States.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Polly O. v. Kijakazi · No. 0:20-cv-01820
Judge
Eric Tostrud
Date
June 21, 2022

Background

Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Cowan Wright issued a Report and Recommendation on May 25, 2022. The recommendation addressed Polly O.’s motion for attorney fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act, a federal law that can allow a qualifying party to recover fees incurred in litigation against the United States. The opinion states that no party objected.

Court’s analysis

Because there were no objections, the district court reviewed the Report and Recommendation for clear error under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). Clear-error review asks whether the recommendation contains an obvious mistake. The court found no clear error based on the case files, records, and proceedings.

Ruling

The court accepted the Report and Recommendation and granted Polly O.’s motion for attorney fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act. It awarded $9,655.50 in attorney fees and $500 in costs from the Judgment Fund. Citing the Act and Astrue v. Ratliff, the court ordered that the fees and costs be paid to Polly O. as the litigant, subject to an offset for any preexisting debt Polly O. may owe to the United States.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.