McAdory v. United States
- Wilhelmina Wright
- 0:22-cv-00769
- U.S. District Court · District of Minnesota
- 1
In McAdory v. United States, Judge Wright adopted an unchallenged recommendation, denied McAdory’s habeas petition, and dismissed the matter without prejudice.
Carlos Lattrell McAdory, whose habeas petition was denied and whose matter was dismissed without prejudice.
What happened
In McAdory v. United States, the court reviewed a magistrate judge’s recommendation concerning Carlos Lattrell McAdory’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus. No party filed objections to the recommendation.
Because there were no timely objections, the court reviewed the recommendation for clear error. It found no clear error and adopted the recommendation.
Judge Wilhelmina M. Wright denied McAdory’s petition and dismissed the matter without prejudice, meaning the order did not bar refiling.
The detailed version
- McAdory v. United States · No. 0:22-cv-00769
- Wilhelmina Wright
- July 25, 2022
Background
Carlos Lattrell McAdory filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus against the United States of America. The court considered an April 27, 2022 report and recommendation by United States Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois. The opinion states that no objections to the report and recommendation were filed.
Court’s Analysis
When no timely objections are filed, the court reviews a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation for clear error. Judge Wright reviewed the report and recommendation and found no clear error. The opinion does not describe the underlying grounds for McAdory’s petition or the report and recommendation’s detailed reasoning.
Disposition
The court adopted the April 27, 2022 report and recommendation, denied McAdory’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus, and dismissed the matter without prejudice. The court ordered judgment to be entered accordingly.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.