Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
D. Minn.Procedural orderFiled Aug. 26, 2022

Li v. New Asia Chinese Restaurant Wan Da Inc

Judge
Eric Tostrud
Docket
0:22-cv-01665
Court
U.S. District Court · District of Minnesota
Pages
5
FlsaClass ActionDiscoveryCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Changshan Li v. New Asia, Judge Thorson conditionally certified an FLSA collective action and partly approved court-supervised notice.

Who this affects

Changshan Li, potential current and former non-exempt employees of New Asia in the United States who worked there during the specified three-year period, New Asia, and the attorneys handling the collective action.

What happened

In Changshan Li v. New Asia Chinese Restaurant Wan Da Inc., the court considered Changshan Li’s request to conditionally certify a collective action under the Fair Labor Standards Act and send notice to potentially eligible employees. At this early stage, the court found that Li met the required burden.

The court granted conditional certification for current and former non-exempt employees of New Asia in the United States who worked there during the three years before the court-approved notice was issued. It ordered New Asia to provide counsel with names and last-known mailing and email addresses for potential collective members. The court granted in part the request to send notice by mail and email, required changes to the proposed notice, set a 90-day opt-in period, and denied requests for telephone information and text-message responses.

The court also stayed discovery and most other deadlines, except matters concerning the pending motion to dismiss, and canceled the scheduled hearing. The order was signed by United States Magistrate Judge Becky R. Thorson.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Li v. New Asia Chinese Restaurant Wan Da Inc · No. 0:22-cv-01665
Judge
Eric Tostrud
Date
Aug. 26, 2022

Background

Changshan Li moved for conditional certification of a collective action under Section 216(b) of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) and for court-supervised notice to potential collective-action members. The opinion explains that FLSA collective actions allow employees to sue on behalf of themselves and other employees who are similarly situated.

The court described a two-stage process. At the initial stage, a plaintiff must provide evidence beyond the complaint showing a factual basis for claiming that potential collective members were affected by a common decision, policy, or plan. After discovery, the court applies a stricter, fact-intensive standard and may decide whether the case should continue collectively or be divided into separate cases. The court found that this case was at the initial stage and that Li met the applicable burden.

Rulings

The court granted Li’s motion for conditional certification under the FLSA. The conditionally certified group includes all individuals currently or formerly employed by New Asia Chinese Restaurant Wan Da Inc., doing business under the names listed in the order, anywhere in the United States as non-exempt employees at any time during the three years before the court-approved notice is issued.

Subject to further court order, the court designated Charlie R. Alden, Jian Hang, and Ge Qu as counsel for the FLSA collective-action class. The court directed New Asia to provide counsel with a computer-readable file containing the names, last-known physical addresses, and last-known email addresses of potential collective-action members employed since June 27, 2019, through the date of the order.

The court granted in part the request to provide notice by United States mail and email. Counsel was authorized to send the notice, an opt-in consent form, and a proposed reminder by first-class mail and email. The court required the notice to be changed by removing references to Hong Sheng Lin and Rong Lin from its first paragraph, so that references to the defendants in the notice would refer only to New Asia Chinese Restaurant Wan Da Inc. The court denied the request for potential members’ last-known telephone numbers and dates of employment at this notice stage and directed counsel to discuss possible future discovery. The court also denied the request to allow consent forms to be returned by text message because the approved notice would use only mail and email.

Potential members who wished to join the collective action were required to do so within 90 days after counsel mailed the notice and consent forms. The court set rules for when consent forms would be considered effective and filed, and required counsel to electronically file received forms weekly and no later than 14 days after the opt-in period ended.

Other case-management orders

The court stayed all discovery and other deadlines, except deadlines related to the pending motion to dismiss, until after a pretrial conference. The court canceled the hearing that had been scheduled for September 1, 2022, on the motion for conditional certification and court-supervised notice.

Disposition

The motion for conditional certification was granted. The request for FLSA notice by mail and email was granted in part, subject to the modifications stated in the order. The court also entered the information, opt-in, discovery-stay, and hearing-cancellation orders described above. The order was signed by Becky R. Thorson, United States Magistrate Judge.

The authoritative version

Read the full 5-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.