Barron v. United States
- Eric Tostrud
- 0:22-cv-01797
- U.S. District Court · District of Minnesota
- 1
In Barron v. United States, Judge Tostrud accepted the recommendation and transferred the matter to Illinois under 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a).
Joshua Paul Barron and the United States of America; the matter will proceed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Illinois.
What happened
In Barron v. United States, Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois issued a report and recommendation on September 30, 2022.
Neither party objected to the recommendation, so the court reviewed it for clear error. The opinion states that the court found no clear error.
Judge Eric C. Tostrud accepted the recommendation and ordered the matter transferred to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Illinois under 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a).
The detailed version
- Barron v. United States · No. 0:22-cv-01797
- Eric Tostrud
- Oct. 24, 2022
Background
Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois issued a Report and Recommendation on September 30, 2022. The opinion does not describe the underlying claims or explain why transfer was recommended.
Review of the Recommendation
No party objected to the Report and Recommendation. Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b), the district court therefore reviewed it for clear error, meaning an obvious mistake in the magistrate judge’s recommendation. The court found no clear error.
Ruling
Judge Eric C. Tostrud accepted the Report and Recommendation and ordered the matter transferred to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Illinois under 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a). The order transferred the matter; it did not dismiss the case.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.