Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
D. Minn.Procedural orderFiled Nov. 10, 2022

Franklin v. Warden

Judge
Eric Tostrud
Docket
0:22-cv-02311
Court
U.S. District Court · District of Minnesota
Pages
1
HabeasCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Franklin v. Warden, Judge Tostrud accepted the recommendation, summarily dismissed Franklin’s habeas petition, and denied his application to proceed without paying fees.

Who this affects

Gordon Franklin, Jr.; his habeas petition was summarily dismissed and his application to proceed without paying filing fees was denied.

What happened

Gordon Franklin, Jr. petitioned for a writ of habeas corpus against the Warden of Rochester Medical Center. Magistrate Judge John F. Docherty issued a report and recommendation on October 20, 2022, and no party objected.

Because there were no objections, the district court reviewed the recommendation for clear error. The opinion says the court found no clear error, but it does not explain the recommendation’s underlying reasons or address the substance of Franklin’s petition.

Judge Eric C. Tostrud accepted the report and recommendation, summarily dismissed Franklin’s habeas petition, and denied his application to proceed without paying the filing fees.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Franklin v. Warden · No. 0:22-cv-02311
Judge
Eric Tostrud
Date
Nov. 10, 2022

Background

Gordon Franklin, Jr. filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus and an application to proceed without paying filing fees. Magistrate Judge John F. Docherty issued a Report and Recommendation on October 20, 2022. The opinion states that no party objected to the recommendation.

Court’s analysis

Under the applicable procedure, the district court reviewed the unobjected-to recommendation for clear error. Judge Tostrud stated that he found no clear error based on the case files, records, and proceedings. The opinion does not state the recommendation’s reasoning or explain the basis for summarily dismissing the habeas petition. It therefore does not show that the court reached the merits of Franklin’s habeas claims.

Disposition

Judge Eric C. Tostrud ordered that the Report and Recommendation be accepted, Gordon Franklin, Jr.’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus be summarily dismissed, and Franklin’s application to proceed without paying filing fees be denied.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.