Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
D. Minn.Procedural orderFiled Dec. 12, 2022

Sarah K. v. Kijakazi

Judge
Elizabeth Wright
Docket
0:21-cv-02223
Court
U.S. District Court · District of Minnesota
Pages
5
Fee PetitionSocial Security
In one sentence

In Sarah K. v. Kijakazi, Judge Wright granted Sarah K.’s motion for $9,196.18 in Equal Access to Justice Act attorney fees.

Who this affects

Sarah K. receives the $9,196.18 fee award as the litigant, subject to any required offset for debts owed to the United States. After that offset, the payment is to be sent in her name to the office of Karl E. Osterhout, her counsel; the Commissioner must make the payment.

What happened

Sarah K. sued to challenge the denial of her applications for disability benefits and Supplemental Security Income. The court had earlier sent the case back to the Social Security Commissioner based on the parties’ agreement.

Sarah K. then asked for $9,196.18 in attorney fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act. The Commissioner did not object to the amount, and the court found that the requested hourly rate and 41.40 hours of work were reasonable.

In Sarah K. v. Kijakazi, Judge Wright granted the motion and awarded $9,196.18. The award is payable to Sarah K., may be reduced to cover qualifying debts to the United States, and must then be sent in her name to her attorney’s office.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Sarah K. v. Kijakazi · No. 0:21-cv-02223
Judge
Elizabeth Wright
Date
Dec. 12, 2022

Background

Sarah K. filed the underlying case seeking review of the Acting Commissioner of Social Security’s decision denying her applications for Supplemental Security Income and Disability Insurance Benefits. On June 7, 2022, the court remanded the case to the Commissioner under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), based on the parties’ joint stipulations.

Sarah K. later moved for attorney fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act, a federal law that can require the government to pay reasonable fees when a qualifying party succeeds in a case against the United States. She requested $9,196.18 for 41.40 hours of work at an hourly rate of $222.13. The Commissioner did not object to the amount and did not argue that the government’s position had been substantially justified.

Court’s Analysis

The court explained that the Equal Access to Justice Act generally limits attorney fees to $125 per hour unless an increased cost of living or another special factor supports a higher rate. The court accepted the cost-of-living adjustment supporting the requested $222.13 hourly rate. It also reviewed counsel’s itemized time records and found that 41.40 hours of work were neither excessive nor unreasonable.

Disposition

The court granted Sarah K.’s motion and awarded $9,196.18 in reasonable attorney fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act. Under the court’s order, the award is payable to Sarah K. as the litigant and is subject to an offset for any pre-existing debts she may owe to the United States. After any required offset, the payment must be sent in Sarah K.’s name to the office of Karl E. Osterhout, her counsel, pursuant to the assignment of attorney fees.

The authoritative version

Read the full 5-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.