Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
D. Minn.Procedural orderFiled Jan. 10, 2023

Franklin v. FMC Rochester

Judge
Wilhelmina Wright
Docket
0:22-cv-02287
Court
U.S. District Court · District of Minnesota
Pages
2
HabeasCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Franklin v. FMC Rochester, Judge Wright adopted the recommendation, denied Franklin’s habeas petition, denied his fee-waiver request as moot, and dismissed the matter without prejudice.

Who this affects

Gordon Franklin, Jr.’s habeas petition was denied, his application to proceed without paying filing fees was denied as moot, and the matter was dismissed without prejudice. FMC Rochester was the respondent.

What happened

In Franklin v. FMC Rochester, Gordon Franklin, Jr., filed a petition asking for a court order concerning his detention at FMC Rochester. The opinion does not describe the petition’s underlying claims.

A magistrate judge issued a report and recommendation on October 19, 2022. Franklin filed a later submission, but the court found that it did not specifically object to the recommendation and instead appeared to repeat earlier claims and add requests for relief.

After reviewing the recommendation for clear error, Judge Wilhelmina M. Wright found none. She adopted the recommendation, denied Franklin’s petition, denied his application to proceed without paying filing fees as moot, and dismissed the matter without prejudice.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Franklin v. FMC Rochester · No. 0:22-cv-02287
Judge
Wilhelmina Wright
Date
Jan. 10, 2023

Background

Gordon Franklin, Jr., filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus against FMC Rochester. The opinion does not explain the substance of Franklin’s claims. United States Magistrate Judge Dulcie Foster issued a Report and Recommendation on October 19, 2022.

After the Report and Recommendation was filed, Franklin submitted a memorandum on October 31, 2022. Although the memorandum used terms referring to a magistrate judge and a recommendation, the court found that it did not address or object to the recommendation’s substance. The court said the filing instead appeared to repeat Franklin’s initial claims and present a new list of requested relief. Under Local Rule 72.2(b)(1), objections must be specific.

Court’s Review

Because Franklin did not make timely, specific objections, the court reviewed the Report and Recommendation for clear error. Clear-error review asks whether the recommendation contains an obvious mistake. After reviewing it, the court found no clear error.

Rulings

Judge Wilhelmina M. Wright adopted the October 19, 2022 Report and Recommendation. The court denied Franklin’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus, denied his application to proceed without paying filing fees as moot, and dismissed the matter without prejudice. The opinion does not provide the underlying reasons for denying the habeas petition because the adopted Report and Recommendation is not included in the provided text.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.