Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
D. Minn.Procedural orderFiled Mar. 15, 2023

Ricketson v. Advantage Collection Professionals, LLC

Judge
Wilhelmina Wright
Docket
0:21-cv-02541
Court
U.S. District Court · District of Minnesota
Pages
13
Fee PetitionCivil ProcedureConsumer Credit
In one sentence

In Ricketson v. Advantage Collection Professionals, Judge Wright granted fees in part, awarding $12,133.35 and denying costs as moot.

Who this affects

Advantage Collection Professionals, LLC receives $12,133.35 in attorney fees. Michael Sheridan is ordered to personally pay that amount. Advantage’s request for costs was denied as moot.

What happened

In Ricketson v. Advantage Collection Professionals, LLC, Kelly L. Ricketson accepted the collection agency’s offer to resolve her debt-collection lawsuit for $1,001 plus costs and reasonable attorney fees. The remaining dispute concerned the amount of fees and costs.

The court found that Ricketson’s attorney, Michael Sheridan, unreasonably prolonged the fee dispute by refusing to provide billing information, making settlement demands unsupported by his billing records, and serving additional discovery after an earlier fee order. Advantage asked for compensation for the extra work caused by that conduct.

Judge Wilhelmina M. Wright granted Advantage’s motion in part and denied it in part: she awarded Advantage $12,133.35 in attorney fees, denied its request for costs as moot, and ordered Sheridan to personally pay the fee award.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Ricketson v. Advantage Collection Professionals, LLC · No. 0:21-cv-02541
Judge
Wilhelmina Wright
Date
Mar. 15, 2023

Background

Kelly L. Ricketson alleged that Advantage Collection Professionals, LLC, violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act while attempting to collect approximately $100 in debt. Ricketson accepted Advantage’s offer of judgment for $1,001 plus costs and reasonable attorney fees on December 30, 2021.

After the offer’s acceptance, Ricketson’s attorney, Michael Sheridan, and Advantage disputed the amount of attorney fees and costs. Sheridan did not provide his billing records when Advantage requested information about the claimed fees. He later sought $10,000 and stated that he was authorized to settle the fee dispute for $9,001, even though his billing records showed lower amounts at the relevant times. Sheridan also delayed filing a satisfaction of judgment after Advantage paid the $1,001 judgment.

In an earlier order, the court granted in part and denied in part Ricketson’s request for fees and costs, limiting her recoverable fees to work performed through acceptance of the offer of judgment. The court also granted Advantage’s request for fees under 28 U.S.C. § 1927 in an amount to be determined and directed Advantage to file supporting materials.

Section 1927 fees

Section 1927 allows a court to require an attorney to personally pay additional costs and attorney fees caused by unreasonably and vexatiously multiplying court proceedings. The court found that Sheridan’s refusal to provide relevant billing information and his use of procedural rules to obstruct and prolong the fee dispute met that standard. The court also found that his conduct continued after the earlier order, including serving discovery seeking documents that the court considered unnecessary or irrelevant to Advantage’s fee request.

The court concluded that Advantage was entitled to reasonable attorney fees for work performed after December 30, 2021, through October 21, 2022, the filing date of the present motion. It approved the hourly rates charged by Advantage’s attorneys, Michael Klutho and Patrick Newman, and found that their 45.7 hours of work were reasonable. The resulting fee amount was $12,133.35.

Disposition

The court granted in part and denied in part Advantage’s motion for attorney fees and costs. It granted the request for attorney fees and awarded Advantage $12,133.35 pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 1692k(a)(3). It denied the request for costs as moot because Advantage withdrew that request. The court ordered Michael Sheridan, rather than Ricketson, to personally satisfy the $12,133.35 fee award under 28 U.S.C. § 1927, and directed that judgment be entered accordingly.

The authoritative version

Read the full 13-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.