Board of Trustees of the Teamsters Joint Council 32 - Employers Health and…
Board of Trustees of the Teamsters Joint Council 32 - Employers Health and Welfare Fund v. H. Brooks and Company LLC
- Katherine Menendez
- 0:21-cv-01455
- U.S. District Court · District of Minnesota
- 3
In Board of Trustees v. H. Brooks, Judge Menendez granted $3,516.80 in fees and costs as a compensatory contempt sanction.
The order directly affects H. Brooks and Company LLC, which was ordered to pay $3,516.80 to the Board of Trustees of the Teamsters Joint Council 32 - Employers Health and Welfare Fund.
What happened
In Board of Trustees of the Teamsters Joint Council 32 - Employers Health and Welfare Fund v. H. Brooks and Company LLC, the court had previously found H. Brooks and Company LLC in contempt and ruled that the contempt caused the Fund to incur expenses. The court had ordered the company to pay reasonable attorney’s fees and costs related to the contempt motion.
The Fund requested $3,516.80: $3,243.00 in attorney’s fees and $273.80 in costs. Its lawyer submitted a declaration and billing records describing the work performed, including legal research, court filings, communications, and attending the contempt hearing.
Judge Katherine Menendez granted the request. She found the hourly rate, work performed, hours claimed, billing records, and total amount reasonable and necessary, and ordered H. Brooks and Company LLC to pay $3,516.80 to the Fund.
The detailed version
- Board of Trustees of the Teamsters Joint Council 32 - Employers Health and… · No. 0:21-cv-01455
- Katherine Menendez
- Mar. 8, 2023
Background
On December 1, 2022, the court granted the Fund’s motion for contempt and found that H. Brooks and Company LLC’s contempt caused the Fund to incur expenses. The court determined that the Fund could recover a compensatory sanction—an amount designed to reimburse losses caused by the contempt—and directed the company to pay reasonable attorney’s fees and costs incurred in bringing the contempt motion.
On December 9, 2022, the Fund’s counsel, Jane Poole, submitted a declaration and supporting exhibits. She described work including legal research, research concerning service, communications with the court, preparation of filings and a memorandum of law, review of docket materials, correspondence with an attorney allegedly representing Jason Jaynes, and travel to and attendance at the hearing. Poole stated that her hourly rate was $230, that she had practiced law since 2010, and that the rate was comparable to rates charged by attorneys with similar experience and expertise in the relevant Minnesota areas.
Requested Fees and Costs
The Fund sought $3,243.00 in attorney’s fees and $273.80 in costs, for a total of $3,516.80. The billing records supported the claimed fees and costs.
Court’s Analysis
The court found that Poole’s hourly rate was reasonable. It also found that the tasks performed and hours claimed were reasonable and necessary to litigate the contempt motion, that the billing records supported the request, and that the requested amount reflected the reasonable fees and costs caused by H. Brooks and Company LLC’s civil contempt. The court further found that the sanction was no greater than necessary to compensate the Fund.
Disposition
Judge Katherine Menendez granted the Fund’s request and ordered Defendant H. Brooks and Company LLC to pay $3,516.80 to the Fund as compensation for attorney’s fees and expenses incurred in litigating the contempt motion. The order’s payment directive names H. Brooks and Company LLC.
Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.
Related cases
- Triple S Farms LLC, Green Acres Dairy, LLC, Charles Fry and Emily Snyder, Rocky…Jul 2026
- United States Securities and Exchange Commission v. Carebourn Capital, L.P…Mar 2026
- Event Sales, Inc. v. The TJX Companies, Inc.; Federal Express Corporation…Feb 2026
- J.V.v. Asset Vision
- Stotesberyv. Muy Pizza-Tejas
- Paula A.v. O'Malley