Schlegel v. Segal
- Paul Magnuson
- 0:22-cv-03021
- U.S. District Court · District of Minnesota
- 2
In Schlegel v. Segal, Judge Magnuson adopted a magistrate judge’s recommendation, denied Schlegel’s petition, and dismissed the matter without prejudice.
Jacqueline Schlegel’s petition was denied, and her matter was dismissed without prejudice; Michael Segal was the respondent.
What happened
In Schlegel v. Segal, Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois recommended denying Jacqueline Schlegel’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus and dismissing the matter.
Schlegel filed no objections by the deadline. The district court therefore reviewed the recommendation for clear error and found none.
Judge Paul A. Magnuson adopted the recommendation, denied Schlegel’s petition, and dismissed the matter without prejudice.
The detailed version
- Schlegel v. Segal · No. 0:22-cv-03021
- Paul Magnuson
- June 15, 2023
Background
Jacqueline Schlegel filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus against Michael Segal. The opinion does not describe the underlying claims or explain the basis of the petition. United States Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois issued a Report and Recommendation recommending that the petition be denied and the matter dismissed.
Review of the Recommendation
Schlegel did not object to the Report and Recommendation, and the deadline for objections had passed. Because there were no objections, the district court reviewed the recommendation for clear error rather than conducting a full new review of the issues. The court stated that it found no error, clear or otherwise, in the magistrate judge’s reasoning.
Ruling
Judge Paul A. Magnuson ordered that the Report and Recommendation be adopted, that Schlegel’s petition be denied, and that the matter be dismissed without prejudice. The opinion does not provide further explanation of the underlying habeas issues or state why the dismissal was without prejudice.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.