Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
D. Minn.Procedural orderFiled July 6, 2023

Collins v. Lakes Area Pizza, Inc.

Judge
Katherine Menendez
Docket
0:21-cv-01457
Court
U.S. District Court · District of Minnesota
Pages
2
Class ActionFlsaCivil ProcedureFee Petition
In one sentence

In Collins v. Lakes Area Pizza, Judge Menendez granted final approval of class and collective-action settlements, awards, fees, and dismissal with prejudice.

Who this affects

The parties, the certified Minnesota settlement class, the Fair Labor Standards Act collective, the five individually settling claimants, named plaintiff Robert Collins, plaintiffs’ counsel, and the settlement administrator.

What happened

In Collins v. Lakes Area Pizza, Inc., the court reviewed the parties’ proposed class-action and Fair Labor Standards Act settlement after preliminary approval, notice, and a final fairness hearing. No one objected before the hearing or appeared to object at it.

The court granted the consent motion, approved the settlement as fair, reasonable, and adequate, and approved five individual wage-and-hour settlements. It also approved a $5,000 service award for Robert Collins, attorney fees and costs equal to one-third of the gross settlement value, $3,987.80 in litigation costs, and $9,500 for the settlement administrator. The parties were ordered to carry out the settlement, and the case and all asserted claims were dismissed with prejudice.

Judge Katherine Menendez entered the July 6, 2023 order granting final approval and directing that judgment be entered.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Collins v. Lakes Area Pizza, Inc. · No. 0:21-cv-01457
Judge
Katherine Menendez
Date
July 6, 2023

Background

The plaintiffs filed a proposed class-action settlement and individual settlements with Lakes Area Pizza, Inc., and the other defendants. The court had previously certified a Minnesota class for settlement purposes and a collective action under the Fair Labor Standards Act, the federal wage-and-hour law, also for settlement purposes. It preliminarily approved both settlements, approved the proposed notice, ordered notice to be distributed, and scheduled a final fairness hearing.

The court held the final fairness hearing on April 11, 2023. Neither the court nor counsel received a settlement objection before the hearing, and no objector appeared at the hearing. The court also found that the required notice to federal and state officials had been given and that the applicable waiting period had passed without an objection from those officials.

Ruling

The court granted the plaintiffs’ consent motion for final approval. It approved the parties’ settlement agreement and release as a fair, reasonable, and adequate resolution of bona fide disputes. It separately approved the individual settlements of Brandon Gageby, Kevin Gageby, Noah Jones, Austin Kadlec, and David Shindley as fair, reasonable, and adequate resolutions of their wage-and-hour claims.

The court also approved a $5,000 service award to named plaintiff Robert Collins. It found the attorney-fee rates sought by plaintiffs’ counsel reasonable and approved an award of fees and costs equal to one-third of the gross settlement value. In addition, it awarded plaintiffs’ counsel $3,987.80 for litigation costs and awarded the settlement administrator $9,500 for fees and costs.

The parties were ordered to carry out the settlement terms. The court dismissed the matter and all claims asserted in it with prejudice and directed that judgment be entered.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.