Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
D. Minn.Procedural orderFiled July 12, 2023

Amen El v. Social Security Administration

Judge
Paul Magnuson
Docket
0:23-cv-00428
Court
U.S. District Court · District of Minnesota
Pages
2
Civil ProcedureFee Petition
In one sentence

Amen El v. Social Security Administration — Judge Magnuson dismissed the mandamus petition without prejudice for failure to prosecute and denied fee applications as moot.

Who this affects

Pharoah El-Forever Left-I Amen El’s petition was dismissed without prejudice, and his applications to proceed without prepaying fees or costs were denied as moot. The Social Security Administration was the respondent.

What happened

In Amen El v. Social Security Administration, the court dismissed Pharoah El-Forever Left-I Amen El’s petition asking the court to compel action by the Social Security Administration. The dismissal was without prejudice and based on failure to prosecute.

A magistrate judge recommended dismissal. Amen El did not object before the deadline. The court therefore reviewed the recommendation for clear error and found none.

Judge Paul A. Magnuson adopted the recommendation, dismissed the petition without prejudice, and denied Amen El’s applications to proceed without prepaying fees or costs as moot.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Amen El v. Social Security Administration · No. 0:23-cv-00428
Judge
Paul Magnuson
Date
July 12, 2023

Background

Pharoah El-Forever Left-I Amen El filed a petition asking the court to issue an order requiring the Social Security Administration to take some action. The opinion describes this as a petition for a writ of mandamus, meaning a request for a court order compelling a government agency or official to perform a required duty.

Report and Recommendation

United States Magistrate Judge Douglas L. Micko recommended that the petition be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. Amen El did not file objections, and the deadline for doing so had passed. Without specific objections, the district court reviewed the recommendation only for clear error, meaning an obvious mistake.

Ruling

The court found no error in the magistrate judge’s reasoning and adopted the Report and Recommendation. It dismissed the mandamus petition without prejudice for failure to prosecute. It also denied as moot Amen El’s applications to proceed in the district court without prepaying fees or costs.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.