Dupree v. Segal
- Wilhelmina Wright
- 0:23-cv-01676
- U.S. District Court · District of Minnesota
- 1
In Dupree v. Segal, Judge Wright adopted the magistrate judge’s recommendation, denied Dupree’s petition, and dismissed the matter with prejudice.
Linda Sade’ Dupree’s petition was denied, and the matter was dismissed with prejudice; Michael Segal was the respondent.
What happened
In Dupree v. Segal, Linda Sade’ Dupree filed a petition against Michael Segal. The court considered a magistrate judge’s recommendation after receiving no objections.
Because no objections were filed, the court reviewed the recommendation for clear error, meaning an obvious mistake. The court found no clear error.
Judge Wilhelmina M. Wright adopted the recommendation, denied Dupree’s petition, and dismissed the matter with prejudice. The opinion does not explain the underlying basis for the petition or provide a merits analysis.
The detailed version
- Dupree v. Segal · No. 0:23-cv-01676
- Wilhelmina Wright
- July 26, 2023
Background
Linda Sade’ Dupree filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus against Michael Segal. The court considered a June 21, 2023 report and recommendation by United States Magistrate Judge Douglas L. Micko.
Court’s Review
No objections were filed to the report and recommendation. Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b), the court therefore reviewed it for clear error, meaning an obvious mistake. The court reviewed the report and recommendation, along with the case records, and found no clear error.
Ruling
The court adopted the June 21, 2023 report and recommendation. It denied Dupree’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus and dismissed the matter with prejudice, meaning the matter may not be refiled. The opinion does not describe the petition’s underlying claims or explain whether the court reached their merits.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.