Wiley v. Ramsey County Chief Deputy Sherriff
- Katherine Menendez
- 0:23-cv-00470
- U.S. District Court · District of Minnesota
- 2
In Wiley v. Ramsey County Chief Deputy Sheriff, Judge Menendez dismissed the action without prejudice after finding no error in an unobjected report and recommendation.
Malcolm J. Wiley's action against Ramsey County Chief Deputy Sheriff and Ramsey County Health Services was dismissed without prejudice.
What happened
In Wiley v. Ramsey County Chief Deputy Sheriff, Malcolm J. Wiley sued the Ramsey County Chief Deputy Sheriff and Ramsey County Health Services. A magistrate judge issued a report and recommendation, and no one objected within the allowed time.
The district court reviewed the report and recommendation for clear error and found none. The opinion does not explain the underlying reason for the recommended dismissal.
Judge Katherine M. Menendez ordered that the action be dismissed without prejudice, meaning the dismissal did not bar a future filing. The court also directed entry of judgment.
The detailed version
- Wiley v. Ramsey County Chief Deputy Sherriff · No. 0:23-cv-00470
- Katherine Menendez
- Aug. 11, 2023
Background
The matter came before the court on a report and recommendation issued by United States Magistrate Judge John F. Docherty on June 20, 2023. The opinion states that no objections were filed within the permitted period.
Court’s Review
When no specific objections are filed, the district court reviews a report and recommendation for clear error. Judge Menendez stated that, after reviewing the report and the record, the magistrate judge had committed no error, clear or otherwise. The opinion provided does not state the underlying reasons for the recommended dismissal.
Disposition
The court ordered that the action be dismissed without prejudice and directed that judgment be entered accordingly.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.