Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
D. Minn.Procedural orderFiled Sept. 1, 2023

Kruger v. Lely North America, Inc.

Judge
Katherine Menendez
Docket
0:20-cv-00629
Court
U.S. District Court · District of Minnesota
Pages
3
Class ActionCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Kruger v. Lely North America, Judge Menendez declined Kruger's request to increase his class-representative service award under an approved settlement.

Who this affects

Jared Kruger, the other named plaintiffs and class representatives, and the class members whose settlement was approved.

What happened

Kruger v. Lely North America, Inc. involved a class-action settlement that the court had approved in a separate order. Jared Kruger was one of the named plaintiffs and class representatives.

Kruger told the court that he was dissatisfied with the settlement process, the cash payment to class members, and his role in the negotiations. He asked the court to modify the settlement by increasing his service award, which was $50,000.

Judge Menendez declined the request. She said the court had not found authority to increase the payment and was not comfortable changing one part of the complex settlement, especially because Kruger's award was already higher than those of the other class representatives.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Kruger v. Lely North America, Inc. · No. 0:20-cv-00629
Judge
Katherine Menendez
Date
Sept. 1, 2023

Background

The court was considering the plaintiffs' consent motion for approval of a class-action settlement. The court had approved the final settlement in a separate order. This order addressed Jared Kruger's request to modify the settlement by increasing his payment as a named plaintiff and class representative.

Kruger's Request

Before and during the final approval hearing, Kruger expressed concerns about the settlement process, the amount of the cash payout to class members, and his belief that he had been essential to the litigation and settlement. He stated that he was not seeking to opt out of or generally contest the settlement. He asked for a larger service award, which the opinion states was $50,000.

Court's Analysis

The court explained that courts have discretion to approve service awards for class representatives. It had not found authority allowing it to increase the payment in these circumstances. The court also said it would not be comfortable changing one part of a complex settlement without determining whether other representatives' payments should also be increased or what part of the settlement would fund the increase.

The court noted that Kruger's $50,000 service award was twice as high as any other class representative's award in this case and five times higher than some awards. It also stated that the award was much higher than the average service award and that the judge had never seen such a large award in the judge's prior class-action cases. The court did not suggest that the award had to be reduced.

Disposition

Judge Katherine Menendez respectfully declined Kruger's request to modify the settlement and increase his class-representative award.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.