Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
D. Minn.Procedural orderFiled Oct. 20, 2023

Goldmann v. Sherburne County Sheriffs Department

Judge
Katherine Menendez
Docket
0:21-cv-02530
Court
U.S. District Court · District of Minnesota
Pages
2
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Goldmann v. Sherburne County Sheriffs Department, Judge Menendez accepted a recommendation and dismissed seven plaintiffs’ claims without prejudice for failing to prosecute or respond.

Who this affects

Cory Davis, Randall Ayou, Edgar Cisneros, Mohamed Farah, Chris Rajkaran, Chad Sumner, and Roger Sodetku had their claims dismissed from the action without prejudice.

What happened

In Goldmann v. Sherburne County Sheriffs Department, a magistrate judge recommended dismissing the claims of Cory Davis, Randall Ayou, Edgar Cisneros, Mohamed Farah, Chris Rajkaran, Chad Sumner, and Roger Sodetku. The recommendation said they had failed to prosecute their claims and had not responded to an order requiring them to explain why their claims should not be dismissed.

No one filed an objection by the September 22, 2023 deadline. Because there were no objections, the court reviewed the recommendation for clear error, meaning an obvious mistake, and found none.

Judge Katherine M. Menendez accepted the recommendation and dismissed the seven plaintiffs’ claims from the action without prejudice. The order does not decide the underlying legal claims.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Goldmann v. Sherburne County Sheriffs Department · No. 0:21-cv-02530
Judge
Katherine Menendez
Date
Oct. 20, 2023

Background

The court considered a Report and Recommendation from United States Magistrate Judge Dulce J. Foster. The recommendation stated that Plaintiffs Cory Davis, Randall Ayou, Edgar Cisneros, Mohamed Farah, Chris Rajkaran, Chad Sumner, and Roger Sodetku should be dismissed from the action without prejudice because they failed to prosecute their claims and failed to respond to the court’s August 24, 2023 Order to Show Cause.

Review of the Recommendation

The deadline for objections was September 22, 2023, and no objections were filed. When no specific objection is made, the court reviews the recommendation for clear error—an obvious mistake in the record or reasoning. The court stated that it reviewed the record and found no error, clear or otherwise.

Disposition

The court accepted the Report and Recommendation. It dismissed the claims brought by Cory Davis, Randall Ayou, Edgar Cisneros, Mohamed Farah, Chris Rajkaran, Chad Sumner, and Roger Sodetku from the action without prejudice. The opinion does not decide the merits of those claims, and it does not state what claims remain in the action.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.