Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
D. Minn.Procedural orderFiled Nov. 8, 2023

Boykin v. Pugh

Judge
Katherine Menendez
Docket
0:23-cv-00153
Court
U.S. District Court · District of Minnesota
Pages
2
HabeasCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Boykin v. Pugh, Judge Menendez denied Boykin’s habeas petition and issued no certificate of appealability after finding no clear error in the recommendation.

Who this affects

William Cleveland Alan Boykin’s habeas petition was denied; Jessie Pugh was the named defendant.

What happened

In Boykin v. Pugh, William Cleveland Alan Boykin asked the District of Minnesota to grant a petition for a writ of habeas corpus.

No one objected to Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Cowan Wright’s report and recommendation. The court therefore reviewed it for clear error and found none.

Judge Katherine Menendez denied Boykin’s petition and issued no certificate of appealability. The order does not explain the underlying habeas claim or the recommendation’s reasoning.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Boykin v. Pugh · No. 0:23-cv-00153
Judge
Katherine Menendez
Date
Nov. 8, 2023

Background

The court considered Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Cowan Wright’s report and recommendation dated August 23, 2022. The opinion states that no objections were filed within the permitted period.

Court’s Review

Because no objections were filed, the court reviewed the report and recommendation for clear error. The court stated that, after reviewing the report and the record, it found no error—clear or otherwise. The opinion does not describe the underlying habeas claim or provide the report and recommendation’s reasoning.

Ruling

The court denied William Cleveland Alan Boykin’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus. It also issued no certificate of appealability and directed that judgment be entered accordingly.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.