Hue Y. v. O'Malley
- Eric Tostrud
- 0:23-cv-00209
- U.S. District Court · District of Minnesota
- 2
In Hue Y. v. O’Malley, Judge Tostrud remanded the Social Security matter after partially granting and denying both sides’ requests.
Hue Y. and the Social Security Commissioner; the matter returns to the Social Security Administration for further proceedings.
What happened
Hue Y. v. O’Malley concerns a request for relief in a Social Security case. The opinion does not describe the underlying dispute or the specific relief sought.
A magistrate judge issued a report and recommendation, and no party objected. The district court reviewed the recommendation for clear error and found none.
Judge Eric C. Tostrud accepted the recommendation in part, granted in part and denied in part both parties’ requests for relief, and remanded the matter to the Social Security Administration for further proceedings.
The detailed version
- Hue Y. v. O'Malley · No. 0:23-cv-00209
- Eric Tostrud
- Jan. 17, 2024
Background
Magistrate Judge Dulce J. Foster issued a Report and Recommendation on December 29, 2023. The opinion does not explain the underlying Social Security dispute or the specific arguments supporting either party’s request for relief.
Review of the Recommendation
No party objected to the Report and Recommendation. The district court therefore reviewed it for clear error, meaning an obvious mistake, and found no clear error.
The court’s footnote states that it rejected the recommendation to reverse the Commissioner’s decision in light of the case’s disposition.
Ruling
The court ordered that:
- The Report and Recommendation was accepted in part. - Hue Y.’s Request for Relief was granted in part and denied in part. - The Commissioner’s Request for Relief was granted in part and denied in part. - The matter was remanded to the Social Security Administration under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further proceedings consistent with the Report and Recommendation.
Judge Eric C. Tostrud directed that judgment be entered accordingly.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.