Lidel v. Bosch
- Katherine Menendez
- 0:22-cv-02918
- U.S. District Court · District of Minnesota
- 2
In Lidel v. Schnell, Judge Menendez dismissed Lidel’s amended complaint without prejudice because he did not submit required service forms.
Ricky Lee Lidel’s amended complaint was dismissed without prejudice; the opinion does not state that the underlying claims were decided.
What happened
Ricky Lee Lidel sued Paul Schnell and other defendants. The court considered a magistrate judge’s recommendation after no party filed objections.
The court reviewed the recommendation for clear error and adopted it in full. It dismissed Lidel’s amended complaint without prejudice because he failed to submit service forms for any defendant as required by an earlier court order.
Judge Katherine M. Menendez entered the dismissal and directed that judgment be entered. The opinion does not decide the underlying claims.
The detailed version
- Lidel v. Bosch · No. 0:22-cv-02918
- Katherine Menendez
- Feb. 2, 2024
Background
The court considered a Report and Recommendation issued by United States Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois on August 28, 2023. No objections were filed within the permitted period.
Court’s Analysis
When no objections are filed, the court reviews the recommendation for clear error. After reviewing the recommendation and the record, the court found no error and adopted the recommendation in full.
Ruling
The court dismissed Ricky Lee Lidel’s amended complaint without prejudice because he failed to submit service forms for any defendant, as required by the court’s May 12, 2023 order. The court directed that judgment be entered. The opinion does not resolve the merits of Lidel’s claims.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.