Braun v. Maslankowski
- Jeffrey Bryan
- 0:23-cv-01784
- U.S. District Court · District of Minnesota
- 1
In Braun v. Maslankowski, Judge Jeffrey M. Bryan adopted the recommendation and denied Braun’s motion as moot.
Plaintiff Nathan Braun’s motion for a protective order and temporary injunction was denied as moot.
What happened
In Braun v. Maslankowski, Magistrate Judge Douglas L. Micko issued a recommendation on January 25, 2024. The opinion does not describe the underlying dispute.
No party objected, so the court reviewed the recommendation for clear error, meaning an obvious mistake. The court found none.
Judge Jeffrey M. Bryan adopted the recommendation and denied Nathan Braun’s motion for a protective order and temporary injunction as moot. The opinion does not explain why the motion was moot.
The detailed version
- Braun v. Maslankowski · No. 0:23-cv-01784
- Jeffrey M. Bryan
- Feb. 13, 2024
Background
The opinion concerns Plaintiff Nathan Christopher Braun’s Motion for Protective Order and Temporary Injunction. It does not describe the underlying claims or explain the requested relief.
Review of the Recommendation
The matter came before the court on a January 25, 2024 Report and Recommendation by United States Magistrate Judge Douglas L. Micko. No party objected. The court therefore reviewed the recommendation for clear error, meaning an obvious mistake in the recommendation. The court found no clear error.
Ruling
Judge Jeffrey M. Bryan adopted the Report and Recommendation. The court denied Plaintiff Nathan Braun’s Motion for Protective Order and Temporary Injunction as moot. The opinion does not state why the motion was moot.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.