Myers v. United HealthCare Services, Inc.
- Paul Magnuson
- 0:22-cv-02528
- U.S. District Court · District of Minnesota
- 2
In Myers v. United HealthCare, Judge Magnuson adopted the recommendation and dismissed the case without prejudice for failure to prosecute.
Jennifer Myers’s case was dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute; the order resolved the matter involving United HealthCare Services, Inc.
What happened
In Myers v. United HealthCare Services, Inc., Jennifer Myers sued United HealthCare Services, Inc. The opinion does not describe the underlying claims.
A magistrate judge recommended dismissing the case without prejudice because Myers failed to prosecute it. No one objected to that recommendation before the deadline.
Judge Paul A. Magnuson found no error, adopted the recommendation, and dismissed the case without prejudice for failure to prosecute.
The detailed version
- Myers v. United HealthCare Services, Inc. · No. 0:22-cv-02528
- Paul Magnuson
- Apr. 22, 2024
Background
Jennifer Myers brought this matter against United HealthCare Services, Inc. The opinion does not describe the underlying claims or the events giving rise to the case.
Report and Recommendation
United States Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Cowan Wright issued a Report and Recommendation on March 25, 2024. It recommended dismissing the matter without prejudice for failure to prosecute. No party filed objections, and the time for doing so expired.
Court’s Review and Ruling
Because there were no objections, the court reviewed the recommendation for clear error rather than conducting a full new review. The court found no error, clear or otherwise, in the magistrate judge’s reasoning. Judge Paul A. Magnuson adopted the Report and Recommendation and ordered that the matter be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. The court also directed that judgment be entered.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.