Crosby v. Eischessen
- Katherine Menendez
- 0:23-cv-03691
- U.S. District Court · District of Minnesota
- 2
Crosby v. Eischessen was dismissed without prejudice after Judge Menendez accepted the unobjected-to recommendation.
Kenneth Quinton Crosby’s matter was dismissed without prejudice; the order names B. Eischessen and Federal BOP, et al. as respondents.
What happened
In Kenneth Quinton Crosby v. B. Eischessen and Federal BOP, et al., the court considered a magistrate judge’s recommendation in the case.
No party filed objections within the allowed time. The court therefore reviewed the recommendation for clear error and found none.
Judge Katherine M. Menendez accepted the recommendation in full and ordered the matter dismissed without prejudice, allowing it to be brought again as permitted by law.
The detailed version
- Crosby v. Eischessen · No. 0:23-cv-03691
- Katherine Menendez
- May 13, 2024
Background
The court considered a Report and Recommendation issued by United States Magistrate Judge Tony N. Leung on January 3, 2024. The opinion does not describe the underlying claims or explain the recommendation’s substantive basis.
Review of the Recommendation
No objections were filed within the permitted period. Because there were no objections, the court reviewed the recommendation for clear error rather than conducting a fresh review of the issues. The court stated that it found no error, clear or otherwise, after reviewing the recommendation and the record.
Ruling
Judge Katherine M. Menendez accepted the Report and Recommendation in full. The court ordered that the matter be dismissed without prejudice and directed that judgment be entered accordingly. The opinion does not state the specific reason for the dismissal.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.