Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Nov. 4, 2019

LaDay v. John/Jane Doe

Judge
Colleen McMahon
Docket
1:19-cv-09274
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In LaDay v. John/Jane Doe, Judge McMahon dismissed the case without prejudice because LaDay did not follow an earlier filing restriction.

Who this affects

Christopher LaDAY's case was dismissed without prejudice because he did not pay the required filing fees or obtain the permission required by an earlier court order; permission to proceed without paying fees was also denied for an appeal.

What happened

In LaDay v. John/Jane Doe, Christopher LaDAY filed a new case without a lawyer. An earlier court order barred him from filing new actions without paying fees or first getting permission to proceed without paying them.

The court treated the complaint as requesting permission to proceed without paying filing fees. LaDAY had neither submitted that request nor paid the required fees, and he had not asked for the required permission.

Judge Colleen McMahon dismissed the case without prejudice because LaDAY failed to comply with the earlier order. The court also denied permission to proceed without paying fees for any appeal, certifying that an appeal would not be taken in good faith.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
LaDay v. John/Jane Doe · No. 1:19-cv-09274
Judge
Colleen McMahon
Date
Nov. 4, 2019

Background

Christopher LaDAY filed this new case without a lawyer. The opinion states that, on October 25, 2016, the court had barred him from filing any new action without paying filing fees unless he first obtained the court's permission to proceed without paying them.

Reason for dismissal

LaDAY did not submit an application to proceed without paying filing fees and did not pay the relevant fees. He also did not seek the permission required by the October 25, 2016 order. The court treated his complaint as requesting permission to proceed without paying fees, but dismissed the action because he had not complied with the earlier order.

Ruling

Judge Colleen McMahon dismissed the action without prejudice under 28 U.S.C. § 1651. The opinion does not decide the underlying claims against John/Jane Doe. The court also certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that an appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to proceed without paying fees for purposes of an appeal. The Clerk of Court was directed to assign the matter to Judge McMahon's docket, mail the order to LaDAY, and note service on the docket.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.