Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Nov. 12, 2019

Gunn v. Doe

Judge
Louis Stanton
Docket
1:19-cv-10383
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Gunn v. Doe, Judge McMahon ordered Darrell Gunn to pay filing fees or submit a completed request to proceed without prepayment.

Who this affects

Darrell Gunn, an incarcerated plaintiff representing himself, must either pay the required fees or submit a completed fee-waiver application within 30 days to avoid dismissal of the action.

What happened

In Gunn v. Doe, Darrell Gunn, who was incarcerated and represented himself, filed a civil lawsuit against Jane Doe and others without completing the required request to avoid paying fees upfront.

Gunn submitted a form authorizing payment from his prison account but did not submit the completed fee-waiver application. The court gave him 30 days to either pay $400 or submit the completed application.

Judge McMahon ordered the Clerk to send Gunn the order and said no summons would issue yet. The court warned that failing to comply would result in dismissal and denied fee-waiver status for any appeal from this order.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Gunn v. Doe · No. 1:19-cv-10383
Judge
Louis Stanton
Date
Nov. 12, 2019

Background

Darrell Gunn, who was incarcerated at Sing Sing Correctional Facility and was proceeding without a lawyer, filed a civil action against Jane Doe and other defendants. He submitted the complaint with a prisoner authorization but did not submit a completed application to proceed without paying fees in advance.

Fee requirement

The court explained that filing a civil action required either payment of $400 in fees—a $350 filing fee and a $50 administrative fee—or a completed application to proceed without prepayment of fees. A prisoner seeking this fee-waiver status must also submit a signed prisoner authorization allowing the court to collect the $350 filing fee in installments from the prisoner's account and obtain certified account statements for the preceding six months. The $50 administrative fee does not apply to a person granted this status.

Order

The court ordered Gunn, within 30 days of the order, to either pay the $400 in fees or submit the attached completed application, labeled with docket number 19-CV-10383 (CM). The Clerk was directed to assign the matter to the judge's docket, mail Gunn a copy of the order, and record service on the docket. No summons would issue at that time. If Gunn complied, the case would be processed under the Clerk's procedures; if he did not comply within the allowed time, the action would be dismissed.

Judge McMahon also certified that an appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to proceed without prepaying fees for an appeal. The order additionally cautioned that certain dismissals of a prisoner's action can count as strikes under the Prison Litigation Reform Act, potentially limiting later fee-waiver filings.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.