Canaveral v. Midtown Diner NYC, Inc.
- George Daniels
- 1:19-cv-00635
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 6
In Canaveral v. Midtown Diner NYC, Inc., Judge Daniels adopted a damages recommendation and ordered defendants to pay $67,509 plus fees, costs, and interest.
Santiago Canaveral received a default damages award against Midtown Diner NYC, Inc., doing business as Midtown Restaurant, Nikkos Karadimas, and Vasilis. The defendants were ordered to pay the specified damages, attorneys’ fees, costs, and interest.
What happened
Santiago Canaveral sued Midtown Diner NYC, Inc., doing business as Midtown Restaurant, Nikkos Karadimas, and Vasilis under the Fair Labor Standards Act and New York Labor Law. The court had already entered a default judgment because the defendants failed to defend, and a magistrate judge reviewed the amount of money owed.
The magistrate judge recommended $67,509 in damages, prejudgment and postjudgment interest, and $5,844 in attorneys’ fees and costs. No party objected. The recommendation included unpaid minimum and overtime wages, matching liquidated damages, statutory damages for missing wage notices and statements, and reduced attorneys’ fees and costs.
Judge Daniels reviewed the recommendation for clear error, found none, and adopted it in full. He ordered the defendants to pay $67,509 in damages, $5,844 in attorneys’ fees and costs, prejudgment interest on $28,754.50, and postjudgment interest on all amounts awarded.
The detailed version
- Canaveral v. Midtown Diner NYC, Inc. · No. 1:19-cv-00635
- George Daniels
- Nov. 19, 2019
Background
Santiago Canaveral brought this action against Midtown Diner NYC, Inc., doing business as Midtown Restaurant, Nikkos Karadimas, and Vasilis. He asserted claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) and New York Labor Law (NYLL) for unpaid minimum and overtime wages and related wage-notice and wage-statement violations.
The court had previously granted Canaveral’s motion for a default judgment and referred the calculation of damages to Magistrate Judge James L. Cott. The defendants did not respond to Canaveral’s submissions concerning damages. Magistrate Judge Cott issued a report recommending an award of $67,509 in damages, prejudgment and postjudgment interest, and $5,844 in attorneys’ fees and costs. No party filed objections.
Court’s review of the damages
Because there were no objections, the court reviewed the report for clear error, meaning an obvious mistake after reviewing the record. The court found no clear error and agreed that Canaveral could not recover twice under both the FLSA and NYLL for the same injury. The report properly used the NYLL because it provided the greater recovery and applied the higher New York minimum-wage rates for large employers.
The court approved $28,754.50 for unpaid minimum and overtime wages and an equal amount in liquidated damages. It also approved $5,000 for missing wage notices and $5,000 for missing wage statements, for $10,000 in statutory damages. The total damages award was therefore $67,509.
The court also approved prejudgment interest at 9% per year on $28,754.50, accruing from April 23, 2018, until judgment was entered. It approved postjudgment interest on all awarded sums from entry of judgment until payment.
Attorneys’ fees and costs
The court approved the report’s reductions to the requested attorneys’ fees. It approved $4,674 for associate attorney Silvia Stanciu, $230 for paralegal Marialyn Acevedo, and $500 for junior associate Kenneth Abeyratne, for total attorneys’ fees of $5,404. The court also approved $440 in costs rather than the $601.36 requested because supporting documentation was not provided for certain process-server and postage charges. Attorneys’ fees and costs totaled $5,844.
Disposition
Judge George B. Daniels adopted Magistrate Judge Cott’s report in full. The defendants were ordered to pay Canaveral $67,509 in damages, $5,844 in attorneys’ fees and costs, prejudgment interest on $28,754.50 calculated when judgment was entered, and postjudgment interest on all sums awarded.
Read the full 6-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.