Eric Johnson v. New York State Department of Corrections
- Kenneth Karas
- 7:15-cv-06431
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
In Eric Johnson v. New York State Department, Judge Karas adopted the settlement-enforcement recommendation and ordered Johnson’s reinstatement.
Eric Johnson and the New York State Department of Correction and Community Supervision; the Department was ordered to reinstate Johnson under the settlement’s conditions.
What happened
Eric Johnson sued the New York State Department of Correction and Community Supervision, alleging racial discrimination under Title VII. The parties later reached a settlement that the court approved.
Johnson told the court that the Department had violated the settlement. After an evidentiary hearing, Magistrate Judge Lisa M. Smith recommended enforcing the settlement as written and reinstating Johnson to the next available sergeant’s position at a qualifying facility.
No one objected to the recommendation. Judge Kenneth M. Karas adopted it in full and ordered the Department to reinstate Johnson under the settlement’s stated conditions.
The detailed version
- Eric Johnson v. New York State Department of Corrections · No. 7:15-cv-06431
- Kenneth Karas
- Nov. 19, 2019
Background
Eric Johnson sued the New York State Department of Correction and Community Supervision (DOCCS), alleging racial discrimination in violation of Title VII. On October 5, 2018, the court approved the parties’ Stipulation of Settlement and General Release.
On June 9, 2019, Johnson notified the court that DOCCS had allegedly violated the settlement. DOCCS disputed Johnson’s interpretation of the settlement and asserted that it was complying with the agreement.
Report and Recommendation
Magistrate Judge Lisa M. Smith held an evidentiary hearing on September 13, 2019. On October 24, 2019, she issued a Report and Recommendation (R&R), which recommended enforcing the settlement as written. The R&R recommended that Johnson be reinstated to the next available sergeant’s position at a DOCCS facility, other than Green Haven, no more than 56 miles from his home. It further recommended that the reinstatement occur without regard to DOCCS’s reassignment policy or any existing reassignment or promotion lists.
The parties had 17 days to file objections to the R&R, but no objections were filed. Because there were no objections, Judge Karas reviewed the R&R for clear error and found no substantive error.
Ruling
Judge Karas adopted the R&R in its entirety. The court ordered DOCCS to reinstate Johnson to the next available sergeant’s position at a DOCCS facility other than Green Haven, no more than 56 miles from his home, as provided in paragraph 3(a) of the settlement agreement and without regard to DOCCS’s reassignment policy or existing reassignment or promotion lists.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.