Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Nov. 19, 2019

Jenkins v. United States of America

Judge
Colleen McMahon
Docket
1:19-cv-10586
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Jenkins v. United States, Chief Judge McMahon ordered Darrell Jenkins to pay filing fees or submit fee-waiver forms within 30 days.

Who this affects

Darrell Jenkins, who was representing himself while incarcerated, and the processing of his civil action.

What happened

In Jenkins v. United States of America, Darrell Jenkins filed a civil case without paying the required fees or submitting the forms needed to ask to proceed without paying them upfront.

The court gave Jenkins 30 days to either pay $400 or submit a signed fee-waiver application and a prisoner authorization allowing filing-fee payments to be deducted from his account in installments. The court also directed that no summons issue yet.

Chief Judge McMahon stated that the case would be processed if Jenkins complied and would be dismissed if he did not. She also denied permission to appeal without paying fees, finding that any appeal would not be taken in good faith.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Jenkins v. United States of America · No. 1:19-cv-10586
Judge
Colleen McMahon
Date
Nov. 19, 2019

Background

Darrell Jenkins, who was incarcerated at MDC Brooklyn and was representing himself, filed this civil action without paying the required filing fees. He also did not submit a completed application to proceed without prepaying fees or a prisoner authorization.

Payment or fee-waiver requirements

The court explained that a prisoner starting a civil action must either pay $400 in fees—a $350 filing fee and a $50 administrative fee—or request authorization to proceed without prepaying fees. If that request is granted, the $350 filing fee is collected in installments from the prisoner's account under the Prison Litigation Reform Act. The prisoner authorization also directs the correctional facility to make those deductions and send the court certified account statements for the preceding six months.

The court ordered Jenkins, within 30 days of the order, to either pay the $400 or submit the required application and prisoner authorization. The documents were to identify docket number 19-CV-10586 (CM).

Disposition

The Clerk was directed to assign the case to Judge McMahon, mail Jenkins a copy of the order, and record service on the docket. No summons was to issue at that time. If Jenkins complied, the case would be processed under the Clerk's procedures; if he failed to comply within the allowed time, the action would be dismissed. The order did not decide the underlying claims.

Judge McMahon certified that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without prepaying fees. The order also cautioned that a later dismissal for frivolousness or failure to state a claim could count as a strike under the prisoner-filing statute, and that three strikes generally prevent a prisoner from proceeding without prepaying fees unless the prisoner faces imminent danger of serious physical injury.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.