Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Nov. 20, 2019

Calcano v. Sahadi Fine Foods Inc.

Judge
Alison Nathan
Docket
1:19-cv-09726
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Calcano v. Sahadi Fine Foods, Judge Nathan noted that the action may be dismissed for failure to prosecute and gave Calcano one week to clarify.

Who this affects

Marcos Calcano, because the court warned that his action may be dismissed for failure to prosecute if the requested clarification is not submitted.

What happened

In Calcano v. Sahadi Fine Foods Inc., the court had previously ordered Marcos Calcano to clarify whether he wanted to dismiss the action under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a). The deadline was November 7, but the court had not received his submission as of this order.

The court gave Calcano one week from the order’s date to submit the clarification. The order states that the action may be dismissed for failure to prosecute, meaning failure to move the case forward.

Judge Alison J. Nathan issued this order. The text does not state that the action was dismissed; it warns that dismissal may occur if the required clarification is not submitted.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Calcano v. Sahadi Fine Foods Inc. · No. 1:19-cv-09726
Judge
Alison Nathan
Date
Nov. 20, 2019

Background

Pursuant to an October 31, 2019 order, the court directed Plaintiff Marcos Calcano to clarify by November 7 whether he sought dismissal of the action under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a), the rule governing voluntary dismissal of an action.

Court’s Action

As of the date of the order, the court had not received Calcano’s submission. The court stated that if Calcano submitted a clarification within one week of the order, the action may be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Failure to prosecute means failing to move the case forward. The order cited authority recognizing a district judge’s power to dismiss an action on that basis.

Disposition

The order did not state that the action was dismissed. It required no immediate final dismissal but warned of possible dismissal and allowed one week for Calcano to submit the requested clarification. Alison J. Nathan signed the order as United States District Judge.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.