Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Nov. 21, 2019

Honda v. Vieira

Judge
Colleen McMahon
Docket
1:19-cv-10661
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Honda v. Vieira, Judge McMahon ordered Honda to pay filing fees or submit an amended fee-waiver application.

Who this affects

Marcal Honda was required to pay the $400 in fees or submit an amended application showing that he could not pay; the case would be dismissed if he failed to comply within 30 days.

What happened

In Honda v. Vieira, Marcal Honda brought the action without a lawyer and submitted an application to proceed without paying filing fees upfront.

The court found that Honda’s application did not show that he was unable to pay. Honda reported employment and monthly earnings of $2,500 and left many questions unanswered.

Judge Colleen McMahon gave Honda 30 days to pay $400 or submit an amended application addressing the deficiencies. No summons would issue at that time, and the court said the action would be dismissed if Honda did not comply.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Honda v. Vieira · No. 1:19-cv-10661
Judge
Colleen McMahon
Date
Nov. 21, 2019

Background

Marcal Honda brought the action pro se, meaning without a lawyer. The court explained that a person starting a civil action must either pay $400 in fees—a $350 filing fee and a $50 administrative fee—or submit a complete and signed application to proceed without paying those fees upfront.

Honda submitted an application asking to proceed without prepaying the fees. The court stated that his answers did not establish that he was unable to pay. The application said that Honda was employed and earned $2,500 per month, and it did not answer many of the questions on the form.

Court’s action

The court said it was unable to grant Honda’s application in its current form. It ordered Honda, within 30 days of the order, either to pay the $400 in fees or to submit an amended application. The amended application had to address the identified deficiencies and provide facts showing that Honda could not pay the fees.

The court directed the Clerk of Court to assign the matter to Judge McMahon’s docket, mail Honda a copy of the order, and record service on the docket. No summons was to issue at that time. The court stated that the action would be dismissed if Honda did not comply within the allowed time. It also certified that an appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied fee-waiver status for an appeal.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.